Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Ricoh CX2
78 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
93 Imaging
32 Features
35 Overall
33
Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Ricoh CX2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-525mm (F3.1-5.8) lens
- 435g - 110 x 74 x 74mm
- Launched January 2012
- Older Model is Olympus SP-610UZ
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Revealed August 2009
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Ricoh CX2 Overview
Its time to take a closer look at the Olympus SP-620 UZ and Ricoh CX2, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. There is a sizeable difference among the image resolutions of the SP-620 UZ (16MP) and CX2 (9MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe SP-620 UZ was announced 2 years later than the CX2 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a concise view of how the SP-620 UZ matches up versus the CX2 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Ricoh CX2 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus SP-620 UZ and Ricoh CX2. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus SP-620 UZ Gallery and Ricoh CX2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-620 UZ over the Ricoh CX2
| SP-620 UZ | CX2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2012 |  | August 2009 | Fresher by 30 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Olympus SP-620 UZ
| CX2 | SP-620 UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More exact focus | ||
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SP-620 UZ and Ricoh CX2
| SP-620 UZ | CX2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | No Touch display |
Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Ricoh CX2 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry your camera, you're going to have to factor its weight and size. The Olympus SP-620 UZ has got outer dimensions of 110mm x 74mm x 74mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 2.9") along with a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) while the Ricoh CX2 has specifications of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus SP-620 UZ and Ricoh CX2 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the SP-620 UZ versus the CX2.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the SP-620 UZ and CX2 is 78 and 93 respectively.
Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Ricoh CX2 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its hard to see the difference in sensor sizing purely by looking through technical specs. The graphic here will offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the SP-620 UZ and CX2.
As you have seen, each of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same megapixels. You should anticipate the Olympus SP-620 UZ to result in more detail with its extra 7 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop images more aggressively. The more modern SP-620 UZ is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Ricoh CX2 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Ricoh CX2 Specifications
| Olympus SP-620 UZ | Ricoh CX2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus SP-620 UZ | Ricoh CX2 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2012-01-10 | 2009-08-20 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III+ | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 9 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-525mm (21.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.1-5.8 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1500 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.00 m | 3.00 m (ISO 400) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 435 gr (0.96 lb) | 185 gr (0.41 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 110 x 74 x 74mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 2.9") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | DB-70 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $199 | $341 |