Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Ricoh CX3
78 Imaging
38 Features
36 Overall
37
92 Imaging
33 Features
35 Overall
33
Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Ricoh CX3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-525mm (F3.1-5.8) lens
- 435g - 110 x 74 x 74mm
- Released January 2012
- Old Model is Olympus SP-610UZ
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 206g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Released June 2010
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Ricoh CX3 Overview
Following is a in depth comparison of the Olympus SP-620 UZ and Ricoh CX3, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a noticeable gap among the resolutions of the SP-620 UZ (16MP) and CX3 (10MP) but they come with the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraThe SP-620 UZ was manufactured 20 months after the CX3 making the cameras a generation away from one another. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a concise summary of how the SP-620 UZ scores versus the CX3 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Ricoh CX3 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus SP-620 UZ & Ricoh CX3. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus SP-620 UZ Gallery & Ricoh CX3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-620 UZ over the Ricoh CX3
| SP-620 UZ | CX3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2012 | June 2010 | More modern by 20 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX3 over the Olympus SP-620 UZ
| CX3 | SP-620 UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Very precise focusing | |||
| Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SP-620 UZ and Ricoh CX3
| SP-620 UZ | CX3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display size | |
| Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Missing Touch friendly display |
Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Ricoh CX3 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry around your camera, you'll have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus SP-620 UZ enjoys outside dimensions of 110mm x 74mm x 74mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 2.9") along with a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX3 has dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus SP-620 UZ and Ricoh CX3 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilising during that time. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the SP-620 UZ versus the CX3.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SP-620 UZ and CX3 is 78 and 92 respectively.
Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Ricoh CX3 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's hard to visualise the gap in sensor sizes simply by looking through specs. The pic here may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the SP-620 UZ and CX3.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same resolution. You can anticipate the Olympus SP-620 UZ to result in extra detail due to its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop photos much more aggressively. The fresher SP-620 UZ will have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Ricoh CX3 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Ricoh CX3 Specifications
| Olympus SP-620 UZ | Ricoh CX3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus SP-620 UZ | Ricoh CX3 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2012-01-10 | 2010-06-16 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III+ | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-525mm (21.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.1-5.8 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1500s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.00 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 435 grams (0.96 lbs) | 206 grams (0.45 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 110 x 74 x 74mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 2.9") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | 4 x AA | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $199 | $329 |