Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Ricoh WG-M1
78 Imaging
38 Features
36 Overall
37
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-525mm (F3.1-5.8) lens
- 435g - 110 x 74 x 74mm
- Announced January 2012
- Replaced the Olympus SP-610UZ
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Announced September 2014
Photography Glossary Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
Below is a in depth analysis of the Olympus SP-620 UZ versus Ricoh WG-M1, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof by brands Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the SP-620 UZ (16MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is fairly similar and both cameras posses the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe SP-620 UZ was announced 3 years earlier than the WG-M1 and that is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the SP-620 UZ scores against the WG-M1 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus SP-620 UZ & Ricoh WG-M1. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus SP-620 UZ Gallery & Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-620 UZ over the Ricoh WG-M1
| SP-620 UZ | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display size | 3" |  | 1.5" | Larger display (+1.5") |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 115k | Sharper display (+115k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Olympus SP-620 UZ
| WG-M1 | SP-620 UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | September 2014 |  | January 2012 | More recent by 32 months |
Common features in the Olympus SP-620 UZ and Ricoh WG-M1
| SP-620 UZ | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Missing Touch display |
Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
If you are going to lug around your camera often, you'll need to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus SP-620 UZ comes with outside measurements of 110mm x 74mm x 74mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 2.9") having a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-M1 has sizing of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Look at the Olympus SP-620 UZ versus Ricoh WG-M1 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising at the time. Here is a front view over all size comparison of the SP-620 UZ and the WG-M1.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the SP-620 UZ and WG-M1 is 78 and 91 respectively.
Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very hard to visualise the contrast between sensor measurements only by going over specifications. The graphic underneath will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the SP-620 UZ and WG-M1.
To sum up, both the cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Olympus SP-620 UZ to deliver more detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics way more aggressively. The older SP-620 UZ is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| Olympus SP-620 UZ | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus SP-620 UZ | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2012-01-10 | 2014-09-12 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III+ | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-525mm (21.0x) | (1×) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.1-5.8 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 1.5 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 115 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | - |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1500 secs | - |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 10.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.00 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 435g (0.96 pounds) | 190g (0.42 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 110 x 74 x 74mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 2.9") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 photographs |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | 4 x AA | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $199 | $2,000 |