Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Samsung HZ10W
78 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
90 Imaging
33 Features
27 Overall
30
Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Samsung HZ10W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-525mm (F3.1-5.8) lens
- 435g - 110 x 74 x 74mm
- Revealed January 2012
- Older Model is Olympus SP-610UZ
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 249g - 105 x 61 x 37mm
- Announced May 2009
- Alternative Name is WB500
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Samsung HZ10W Overview
On this page, we will be matching up the Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Samsung HZ10W, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. There exists a large gap among the sensor resolutions of the SP-620 UZ (16MP) and HZ10W (10MP) but both cameras have the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe SP-620 UZ was revealed 2 years later than the HZ10W and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a in-depth comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the SP-620 UZ scores versus the HZ10W with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Samsung HZ10W Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus SP-620 UZ & Samsung HZ10W. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus SP-620 UZ Gallery & Samsung HZ10W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-620 UZ over the Samsung HZ10W
| SP-620 UZ | HZ10W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2012 |  | May 2009 | More recent by 33 months |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ10W over the Olympus SP-620 UZ
| HZ10W | SP-620 UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very exact focus |
Common features in the Olympus SP-620 UZ and Samsung HZ10W
| SP-620 UZ | HZ10W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Equal screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither provides Touch screen |
Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Samsung HZ10W Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to lug around your camera regularly, you have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus SP-620 UZ provides physical dimensions of 110mm x 74mm x 74mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 2.9") accompanied by a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) while the Samsung HZ10W has dimensions of 105mm x 61mm x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") having a weight of 249 grams (0.55 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Samsung HZ10W in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you select during that time. Below is a front view scale comparison of the SP-620 UZ against the HZ10W.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SP-620 UZ and HZ10W is 78 and 90 respectively.
Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Samsung HZ10W Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its hard to see the difference in sensor measurements merely by researching specifications. The graphic here will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the SP-620 UZ and HZ10W.
To sum up, both cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the Olympus SP-620 UZ to provide you with extra detail because of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The newer SP-620 UZ will have an edge in sensor technology.
Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Samsung HZ10W Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Samsung HZ10W Specifications
| Olympus SP-620 UZ | Samsung HZ10W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus SP-620 UZ | Samsung HZ10W |
| Otherwise known as | - | WB500 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2012-01-10 | 2009-05-14 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III+ | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2432 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-525mm (21.0x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.1-5.8 | f/3.3-5.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1500 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.00 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 435 gr (0.96 pounds) | 249 gr (0.55 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 110 x 74 x 74mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 2.9") | 105 x 61 x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $199 | $300 |