Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Samsung SL102
78 Imaging
38 Features
36 Overall
37
96 Imaging
32 Features
21 Overall
27
Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-525mm (F3.1-5.8) lens
- 435g - 110 x 74 x 74mm
- Released January 2012
- Older Model is Olympus SP-610UZ
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Announced January 2009
- Alternative Name is ES55
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Samsung SL102 Overview
The following is a in-depth overview of the Olympus SP-620 UZ and Samsung SL102, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Samsung. There is a large difference between the image resolutions of the SP-620 UZ (16MP) and SL102 (10MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe SP-620 UZ was announced 3 years after the SL102 which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple view of how the SP-620 UZ matches up versus the SL102 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus SP-620 UZ & Samsung SL102. The whole galleries are available at Olympus SP-620 UZ Gallery & Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-620 UZ over the Samsung SL102
| SP-620 UZ | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2012 | January 2009 | Newer by 37 months | |
| Display size | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Olympus SP-620 UZ
| SL102 | SP-620 UZ |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus SP-620 UZ and Samsung SL102
| SP-620 UZ | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Lack of manual focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Same display resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Neither has Touch friendly display |
Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to travel with your camera frequently, you should consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus SP-620 UZ has outside dimensions of 110mm x 74mm x 74mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 2.9") along with a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) while the Samsung SL102 has measurements of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Compare the Olympus SP-620 UZ and Samsung SL102 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are employing at that moment. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the SP-620 UZ and the SL102.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the SP-620 UZ and SL102 is 78 and 96 respectively.
Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its hard to see the gap between sensor dimensions just by looking at a spec sheet. The picture below will offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the SP-620 UZ and SL102.
Clearly, both of these cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same resolution. You can anticipate the Olympus SP-620 UZ to give you extra detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The newer SP-620 UZ is going to have an edge in sensor innovation.
Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
| Olympus SP-620 UZ | Samsung SL102 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus SP-620 UZ | Samsung SL102 |
| Also Known as | - | ES55 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2012-01-10 | 2009-01-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III+ | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-525mm (21.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.1-5.8 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1500 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.00 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 435 grams (0.96 lb) | 116 grams (0.26 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 110 x 74 x 74mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 2.9") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $199 | $130 |