Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus Tough-3000
69 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus Tough-3000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Boost to 1000)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Announced February 2010
- Later Model is Olympus SP-810 UZ
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Launched January 2010
- Other Name is mju Tough 3000
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus Tough-3000 Overview
On this page, we will be analyzing the Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus Tough-3000, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof and both of them are sold by Olympus. The image resolution of the SP-800 UZ (14MP) and the Tough-3000 (12MP) is pretty similar and both cameras offer the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe SP-800 UZ was released within a month of the Tough-3000 and they are of a similar generation. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a in-depth comparison, here is a simple summation of how the SP-800 UZ grades against the Tough-3000 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus SP-800 UZ and Olympus Stylus Tough-3000. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery and Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-800 UZ over the Olympus Tough-3000
| SP-800 UZ | Tough-3000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Olympus SP-800 UZ
| Tough-3000 | SP-800 UZ |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus SP-800 UZ and Olympus Tough-3000
| SP-800 UZ | Tough-3000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2010 |  | January 2010 | Similar generation |
| Focus manually |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Missing Touch screen |
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus Tough-3000 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry around your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus SP-800 UZ provides outside dimensions of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") having a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs) and the Olympus Tough-3000 has measurements of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") with a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).
Check out the Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus Tough-3000 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you select at that moment. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the SP-800 UZ and the Tough-3000.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the SP-800 UZ and Tough-3000 is 69 and 94 respectively.
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus Tough-3000 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's difficult to envision the gap between sensor sizes only by reviewing specifications. The picture below might give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the SP-800 UZ and Tough-3000.
To sum up, the 2 cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You should expect the Olympus SP-800 UZ to deliver greater detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs more aggressively.
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus Tough-3000 Specifications
| Olympus SP-800 UZ | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus SP-800 UZ | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 |
| Otherwise known as | - | mju Tough 3000 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2010-02-02 | 2010-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 1000 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 64 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 143 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-840mm (30.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | f/3.5-5.1 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 2cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 12 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.10 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 455 grams (1.00 lbs) | 159 grams (0.35 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | Li-50B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $270 | $0 |
