Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus TG-630 iHS
69 Imaging
36 Features
35 Overall
35
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/86e58/86e58dbdc1df53889f3e4aef4918a9ae36fe6ab0" alt="Olympus SP-800 UZ front Olympus SP-800 UZ front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/41c7c/41c7c096f5b120d51cec7dfdff2b001e8780d88f" alt="Olympus TG-630 iHS front Olympus TG-630 iHS front"
94 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Expand to 1000)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Introduced February 2010
- Successor is Olympus SP-810 UZ
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 167g - 98 x 66 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Overview
On this page, we are comparing the Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus TG-630 iHS, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Waterproof and both of them are designed by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the SP-800 UZ (14MP) and the TG-630 iHS (12MP) is fairly close and both cameras posses the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The SP-800 UZ was manufactured 3 years before the TG-630 iHS and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief overview of how the SP-800 UZ grades versus the TG-630 iHS in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus SP-800 UZ and Olympus TG-630 iHS. The entire galleries are available at Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery and Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-800 UZ over the Olympus TG-630 iHS
SP-800 UZ | TG-630 iHS |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-630 iHS over the Olympus SP-800 UZ
TG-630 iHS | SP-800 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2013 | ![]() | February 2010 | Fresher by 35 months |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SP-800 UZ and Olympus TG-630 iHS
SP-800 UZ | TG-630 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | No manual focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither includes Touch display |
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry your camera often, you're going to have to factor its weight and size. The Olympus SP-800 UZ features outside dimensions of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") having a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs) and the Olympus TG-630 iHS has specifications of 98mm x 66mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") having a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Check the Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus TG-630 iHS in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are working with during that time. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the SP-800 UZ versus the TG-630 iHS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/92f1b/92f1b71a3bce17213660e3ffb9a11e9c97dd6b19" alt="Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus TG-630 iHS size comparison Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus TG-630 iHS size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SP-800 UZ and TG-630 iHS is 69 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7f362/7f362287a7a070bcfe478be9ded66198abe643b0" alt="Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus TG-630 iHS top view buttons comparison Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus TG-630 iHS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Sensor Comparison
Normally, its difficult to envision the difference in sensor sizing just by researching specifications. The photograph below should give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the SP-800 UZ and TG-630 iHS.
Plainly, each of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same resolution. You should anticipate the Olympus SP-800 UZ to render more detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos more aggressively. The older SP-800 UZ will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/14d60/14d601ea0fc26a181ecc6075610a60315297904f" alt="Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus TG-630 iHS sensor size comparison Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus TG-630 iHS sensor size comparison"
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5771e/5771e2cc151729001b0bcaf064c3380f48fd5e1c" alt="Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Specifications
Olympus SP-800 UZ | Olympus TG-630 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus SP-800 UZ | Olympus TG-630 iHS |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2010-02-02 | 2013-01-08 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Max enhanced ISO | 1000 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 143 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-840mm (30.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 12 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames per sec | 5.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.10 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 455 grams (1.00 pounds) | 167 grams (0.37 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") | 98 x 66 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 220 photos |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Li-50B | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $270 | $200 |