Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus TG-830 iHS
69 Imaging
36 Features
35 Overall
35
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/86e58/86e58dbdc1df53889f3e4aef4918a9ae36fe6ab0" alt="Olympus SP-800 UZ front Olympus SP-800 UZ front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7ddda/7ddda2c742e5091781c9a412322b0944785f369d" alt="Olympus TG-830 iHS front Olympus TG-830 iHS front"
91 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Increase to 1000)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Introduced February 2010
- New Model is Olympus SP-810 UZ
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 214g - 109 x 67 x 28mm
- Launched January 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Overview
Let's take a deeper look at the Olympus SP-800 UZ and Olympus TG-830 iHS, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof and both are created by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the SP-800 UZ (14MP) and the TG-830 iHS (16MP) is very comparable and they possess the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The SP-800 UZ was launched 3 years earlier than the TG-830 iHS which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a complete comparison, below is a short introduction of how the SP-800 UZ matches up vs the TG-830 iHS in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus SP-800 UZ & Olympus TG-830 iHS. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery & Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-800 UZ over the Olympus TG-830 iHS
SP-800 UZ | TG-830 iHS |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-830 iHS over the Olympus SP-800 UZ
TG-830 iHS | SP-800 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2013 | ![]() | February 2010 | More modern by 35 months |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SP-800 UZ and Olympus TG-830 iHS
SP-800 UZ | TG-830 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | No manual focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither features Touch display |
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry around your camera frequently, you should consider its weight and size. The Olympus SP-800 UZ enjoys outside measurements of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") with a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-830 iHS has specifications of 109mm x 67mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 214 grams (0.47 lbs).
See the Olympus SP-800 UZ and Olympus TG-830 iHS in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have chosen at the time. Below is the front view measurements comparison of the SP-800 UZ vs the TG-830 iHS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/31e16/31e164e8e9d43806210335a725b788d0cb96b8c2" alt="Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus TG-830 iHS size comparison Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus TG-830 iHS size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SP-800 UZ and TG-830 iHS is 69 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6af4/a6af46102e03cc7a74c42a8f37c50da330f68904" alt="Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus TG-830 iHS top view buttons comparison Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus TG-830 iHS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be hard to see the gap in sensor sizes simply by seeing specifications. The picture here might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the SP-800 UZ and TG-830 iHS.
Plainly, the two cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but not the same resolution. You can expect to see the Olympus TG-830 iHS to provide extra detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop images a little more aggressively. The more aged SP-800 UZ will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/53dbd/53dbde7ce9623159fce776601b694c0ade44463c" alt="Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus TG-830 iHS sensor size comparison Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus TG-830 iHS sensor size comparison"
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/264c8/264c8eb79ba3676e6e66687bb9158ba30354e090" alt="Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Specifications
Olympus SP-800 UZ | Olympus TG-830 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus SP-800 UZ | Olympus TG-830 iHS |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2010-02-02 | 2013-01-08 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 1000 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 143 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-840mm (30.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 12 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 10.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.10 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 455g (1.00 pounds) | 214g (0.47 pounds) |
Dimensions | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") | 109 x 67 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 pictures |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Li-50B | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $270 | $0 |