Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus TG-2 iHS
69 Imaging
36 Features
35 Overall
35
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Raise to 1000)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Revealed February 2010
- Successor is Olympus SP-810 UZ
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Introduced June 2013
Photography Glossary Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Overview
Its time to take a deeper look at the Olympus SP-800 UZ versus Olympus TG-2 iHS, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof and both of them are created by Olympus. The resolution of the SP-800 UZ (14MP) and the TG-2 iHS (12MP) is pretty comparable and both cameras posses the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe SP-800 UZ was brought out 4 years before the TG-2 iHS and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a in-depth comparison, here is a simple overview of how the SP-800 UZ grades versus the TG-2 iHS in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus SP-800 UZ & Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS. The entire galleries are available at Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery & Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-800 UZ over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
| SP-800 UZ | TG-2 iHS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Olympus SP-800 UZ
| TG-2 iHS | SP-800 UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | June 2013 | February 2010 | Fresher by 41 months | |
| Screen resolution | 610k | 230k | Sharper screen (+380k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SP-800 UZ and Olympus TG-2 iHS
| SP-800 UZ | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | No manual focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen measurements | |
| Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry your camera, you will need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus SP-800 UZ has outside dimensions of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs) while the Olympus TG-2 iHS has dimensions of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Compare the Olympus SP-800 UZ versus Olympus TG-2 iHS in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the SP-800 UZ versus the TG-2 iHS.

Considering size and weight, the portability score of the SP-800 UZ and TG-2 iHS is 69 and 91 respectively.
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very difficult to picture the contrast in sensor sizing simply by checking out specs. The visual below may give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the SP-800 UZ and TG-2 iHS.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different MP. You can expect the Olympus SP-800 UZ to produce more detail having its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The older SP-800 UZ will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Specifications
| Olympus SP-800 UZ | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus SP-800 UZ | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2010-02-02 | 2013-06-28 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 1000 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 143 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-840mm (30.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 610 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display technology | - | OLED |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 12s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames per sec | 5.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.10 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 455g (1.00 lb) | 230g (0.51 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 images |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | Li-50B | Li-90B |
| Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | - |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $270 | $380 |