Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus TG-3
69 Imaging
36 Features
35 Overall
35
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/86e58/86e58dbdc1df53889f3e4aef4918a9ae36fe6ab0" alt="Olympus SP-800 UZ front Olympus SP-800 UZ front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c62ad/c62adda3df33c555b7142020fb576a7ad037cf6b" alt="Olympus Tough TG-3 front Olympus Tough TG-3 front"
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus TG-3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Expand to 1000)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Launched February 2010
- Refreshed by Olympus SP-810 UZ
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Revealed March 2014
- Later Model is Olympus TG-4
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus TG-3 Overview
Below, we will be comparing the Olympus SP-800 UZ and Olympus TG-3, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof and they are both designed by Olympus. The image resolution of the SP-800 UZ (14MP) and the TG-3 (16MP) is pretty similar and they come with the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The SP-800 UZ was unveiled 5 years prior to the TG-3 and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a thorough comparison, below is a simple view of how the SP-800 UZ matches up versus the TG-3 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus TG-3 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus SP-800 UZ & Olympus Tough TG-3. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery & Olympus TG-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-800 UZ over the Olympus TG-3
SP-800 UZ | TG-3 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Olympus SP-800 UZ
TG-3 | SP-800 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | March 2014 | ![]() | February 2010 | More recent by 50 months |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SP-800 UZ and Olympus TG-3
SP-800 UZ | TG-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | No manual focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus TG-3 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to lug around your camera, you will want to consider its weight and size. The Olympus SP-800 UZ has got external dimensions of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") with a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs) and the Olympus TG-3 has specifications of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") along with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus SP-800 UZ and Olympus TG-3 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you select at that time. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the SP-800 UZ compared to the TG-3.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2c0d1/2c0d1bc2662f0fc6bf687629a0d2d69ae2e3456e" alt="Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus TG-3 size comparison Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus TG-3 size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the SP-800 UZ and TG-3 is 69 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e053b/e053b4f936c115cd473873e16fdb6eb9d1d8335b" alt="Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus TG-3 top view buttons comparison Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus TG-3 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus TG-3 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be hard to imagine the contrast between sensor measurements purely by reading a spec sheet. The visual underneath might give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the SP-800 UZ and TG-3.
Clearly, the two cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different MP. You can expect the Olympus TG-3 to deliver more detail having an extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The older SP-800 UZ is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3087/c30877c1fdf42aee14e49cf89558559c138d3999" alt="Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus TG-3 sensor size comparison Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus TG-3 sensor size comparison"
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus TG-3 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a2c5e/a2c5e93a3fa4e9cd56bffc75e48462a33a4b8f1d" alt="Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus TG-3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus TG-3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus TG-3 Specifications
Olympus SP-800 UZ | Olympus Tough TG-3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus SP-800 UZ | Olympus Tough TG-3 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Launched | 2010-02-02 | 2014-03-31 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 1000 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 143 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-840mm (30.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT-LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 12s | 4s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 10.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.10 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 455 gr (1.00 lbs) | 247 gr (0.54 lbs) |
Dimensions | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 330 pictures |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Li-50B | LI-92B |
Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $270 | $350 |