Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus VR-340
69 Imaging
36 Features
35 Overall
35
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/86e58/86e58dbdc1df53889f3e4aef4918a9ae36fe6ab0" alt="Olympus SP-800 UZ front Olympus SP-800 UZ front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0f15c/0f15c591df6691d1385fd9ef9a58f17d9653b4b3" alt="Olympus VR-340 front Olympus VR-340 front"
96 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus VR-340 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Boost to 1000)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Released February 2010
- Renewed by Olympus SP-810 UZ
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.0-5.7) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Released January 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus VR-340 Overview
Following is a extensive analysis of the Olympus SP-800 UZ and Olympus VR-340, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both sold by Olympus. The image resolution of the SP-800 UZ (14MP) and the VR-340 (16MP) is pretty similar and both cameras boast the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The SP-800 UZ was launched 23 months before the VR-340 which makes them a generation away from each other. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a in-depth comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the SP-800 UZ scores versus the VR-340 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus VR-340 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus SP-800 UZ & Olympus VR-340. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery & Olympus VR-340 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-800 UZ over the Olympus VR-340
SP-800 UZ | VR-340 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-340 over the Olympus SP-800 UZ
VR-340 | SP-800 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2012 | ![]() | February 2010 | More modern by 23 months |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SP-800 UZ and Olympus VR-340
SP-800 UZ | VR-340 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Lack of manual focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | No Touch friendly screen |
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus VR-340 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry around your camera often, you will have to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus SP-800 UZ has exterior dimensions of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") along with a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs) and the Olympus VR-340 has sizing of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
Examine the Olympus SP-800 UZ and Olympus VR-340 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are working with at that moment. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the SP-800 UZ compared to the VR-340.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3c77c/3c77cd18167db70328e447bbd743de6d6b4bc41b" alt="Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus VR-340 size comparison Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus VR-340 size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the SP-800 UZ and VR-340 is 69 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ddfd2/ddfd2679041c37d44954c01ff55e138409f186bb" alt="Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus VR-340 top view buttons comparison Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus VR-340 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus VR-340 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is hard to visualize the contrast between sensor sizes merely by going over specs. The image here should provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the SP-800 UZ and VR-340.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You can expect the Olympus VR-340 to deliver greater detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures more aggressively. The more aged SP-800 UZ is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c2862/c28621bc36544cd979ebd36776669011c2d2b21a" alt="Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus VR-340 sensor size comparison Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus VR-340 sensor size comparison"
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus VR-340 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3b30d/3b30d21f3fd698ae4bd29f20afd29ed99302ac8b" alt="Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus VR-340 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus VR-340 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus VR-340 Specifications
Olympus SP-800 UZ | Olympus VR-340 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus SP-800 UZ | Olympus VR-340 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2010-02-02 | 2012-01-10 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 1000 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 143 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-840mm (30.0x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | f/3.0-5.7 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 12s | 4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.10 m | 4.80 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 455g (1.00 pounds) | 125g (0.28 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | Li-50B | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $270 | $130 |