Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus XZ-1
69 Imaging
36 Features
35 Overall
35
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/86e58/86e58dbdc1df53889f3e4aef4918a9ae36fe6ab0" alt="Olympus SP-800 UZ front Olympus SP-800 UZ front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9d8da/9d8da4d616e0872484d1d6071e9a9d7184378d49" alt="Olympus XZ-1 front Olympus XZ-1 front"
88 Imaging
35 Features
51 Overall
41
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus XZ-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Boost to 1000)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Launched February 2010
- Later Model is Olympus SP-810 UZ
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Released January 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus XZ-1 Overview
On this page, we are comparing the Olympus SP-800 UZ versus Olympus XZ-1, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both are manufactured by Olympus. There exists a significant gap between the resolutions of the SP-800 UZ (14MP) and XZ-1 (10MP) and the SP-800 UZ (1/2.3") and XZ-1 (1/1.63") posses different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The SP-800 UZ was introduced 11 months earlier than the XZ-1 so they are both of a similar generation. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise summation of how the SP-800 UZ matches up versus the XZ-1 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus XZ-1 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus SP-800 UZ and Olympus XZ-1. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery and Olympus XZ-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-800 UZ over the Olympus XZ-1
SP-800 UZ | XZ-1 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Olympus SP-800 UZ
XZ-1 | SP-800 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2011 | ![]() | February 2010 | Fresher by 11 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial exact focus | ||
Display resolution | 614k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+384k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SP-800 UZ and Olympus XZ-1
SP-800 UZ | XZ-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither contains Touch display |
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus XZ-1 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry your camera often, you will want to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus SP-800 UZ has got external dimensions of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") with a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs) while the Olympus XZ-1 has sizing of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") with a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs).
Check out the Olympus SP-800 UZ versus Olympus XZ-1 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you choose during that time. Here is a front view size comparison of the SP-800 UZ against the XZ-1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7448c/7448c2d705c1bce66efe0b7f8ef2159db9da042f" alt="Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus XZ-1 size comparison Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus XZ-1 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SP-800 UZ and XZ-1 is 69 and 88 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b8cba/b8cbaaf3f06b5973b85a5d3c8086c442cc1f4ee9" alt="Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus XZ-1 top view buttons comparison Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus XZ-1 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus XZ-1 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be hard to picture the gap between sensor sizing purely by reading through specifications. The photograph below may give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the SP-800 UZ and XZ-1.
To sum up, each of these cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The SP-800 UZ having a tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field tougher and the Olympus SP-800 UZ will give you extra detail using its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The older SP-800 UZ is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2b409/2b409198d940a6f8d5d57a8b8db2698324b5ab5f" alt="Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus XZ-1 sensor size comparison Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus XZ-1 sensor size comparison"
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/226ad/226ad11c560b1b66c5b3cebbf8bca47cd7880b35" alt="Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus XZ-1 Specifications
Olympus SP-800 UZ | Olympus XZ-1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus SP-800 UZ | Olympus XZ-1 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2010-02-02 | 2011-01-26 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | TruePic V |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.63" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 8.07 x 5.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 44.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3664 x 2752 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 1000 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 143 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-840mm (30.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 614 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | - | OLED |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 12 seconds | 60 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.10 m | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 455g (1.00 pounds) | 275g (0.61 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 34 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 18.8 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.4 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 117 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 320 photos |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Li-50B | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $270 | $567 |