Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
69 Imaging
36 Features
35 Overall
35
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/86e58/86e58dbdc1df53889f3e4aef4918a9ae36fe6ab0" alt="Olympus SP-800 UZ front Olympus SP-800 UZ front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2439/d243927345de5a095aa4910f1a6bf1f8c46d0250" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS front Olympus XZ-2 iHS front"
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Push to 1000)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Introduced February 2010
- Refreshed by Olympus SP-810 UZ
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Released December 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
The following is a extended overview of the Olympus SP-800 UZ versus Olympus XZ-2 iHS, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both sold by Olympus. The image resolution of the SP-800 UZ (14MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) is very close but the SP-800 UZ (1/2.3") and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") provide totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The SP-800 UZ was introduced 3 years earlier than the XZ-2 iHS which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the SP-800 UZ scores against the XZ-2 iHS when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus SP-800 UZ & Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery & Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-800 UZ over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
SP-800 UZ | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Olympus SP-800 UZ
XZ-2 iHS | SP-800 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | December 2012 | ![]() | February 2010 | Newer by 35 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus SP-800 UZ and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
SP-800 UZ | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
If you're planning to travel with your camera regularly, you should take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus SP-800 UZ comes with physical dimensions of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") with a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs) whilst the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") along with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus SP-800 UZ versus Olympus XZ-2 iHS in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you use at the time. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the SP-800 UZ vs the XZ-2 iHS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2e0db/2e0db218eea2e72904f7271c834e61fcbb012c57" alt="Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS size comparison Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the SP-800 UZ and XZ-2 iHS is 69 and 85 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/24383/243833ea9cc2ec474241fdca20f7d4320c01ac0f" alt="Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS top view buttons comparison Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Generally, its hard to envision the gap in sensor dimensions just by viewing a spec sheet. The picture here might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the SP-800 UZ and XZ-2 iHS.
As you can see, both cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The SP-800 UZ having a smaller sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field tougher and the Olympus SP-800 UZ will render greater detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images more aggressively. The more aged SP-800 UZ will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a66f4/a66f4406491eecabcc489f3e18565216ac901808" alt="Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS sensor size comparison Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS sensor size comparison"
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b765a/b765a1a1dc17cb5027887c0085b2923f76888637" alt="Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
Olympus SP-800 UZ | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus SP-800 UZ | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2010-02-02 | 2012-12-18 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 |
Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Max enhanced ISO | 1000 | - |
Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 143 | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-840mm (30.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 12 seconds | 60 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 10.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.10 m | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 455 gr (1.00 pounds) | 346 gr (0.76 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 49 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 216 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 340 shots |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-50B | Li-90B |
Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $270 | $450 |