Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Panasonic GX9
69 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
82 Imaging
60 Features
80 Overall
68
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Panasonic GX9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Bump to 1000)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Revealed February 2010
- Replacement is Olympus SP-810 UZ
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 407g - 124 x 72 x 47mm
- Launched February 2018
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Panasonic GX9 Overview
Here, we are evaluating the Olympus SP-800 UZ and Panasonic GX9, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a large gap between the sensor resolutions of the SP-800 UZ (14MP) and GX9 (20MP) and the SP-800 UZ (1/2.3") and GX9 (Four Thirds) boast totally different sensor dimensions.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe SP-800 UZ was launched 9 years before the GX9 and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus SP-800 UZ being a Compact camera and the Panasonic GX9 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting right into a thorough comparison, here is a short summary of how the SP-800 UZ matches up against the GX9 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Panasonic GX9 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus SP-800 UZ & Panasonic Lumix DC-GX9. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery & Panasonic GX9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-800 UZ over the Panasonic GX9
SP-800 UZ | GX9 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic GX9 over the Olympus SP-800 UZ
GX9 | SP-800 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2018 | February 2010 | More recent by 97 months | |
Focus manually | More exact focusing | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 1240k | 230k | Crisper display (+1010k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus SP-800 UZ and Panasonic GX9
SP-800 UZ | GX9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display sizing | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen |
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Panasonic GX9 Physical Comparison
If you're going to lug around your camera, you have to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus SP-800 UZ provides outer measurements of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") with a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs) and the Panasonic GX9 has proportions of 124mm x 72mm x 47mm (4.9" x 2.8" x 1.9") with a weight of 407 grams (0.90 lbs).
Check the Olympus SP-800 UZ and Panasonic GX9 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have at that moment. The following is a front view sizing comparison of the SP-800 UZ and the GX9.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SP-800 UZ and GX9 is 69 and 82 respectively.
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Panasonic GX9 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its difficult to see the contrast between sensor measurements just by checking technical specs. The visual here should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the SP-800 UZ and GX9.
As you have seen, both of the cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The SP-800 UZ featuring a tinier sensor will make shooting shallower DOF trickier and the Panasonic GX9 will resolve greater detail utilizing its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The older SP-800 UZ is going to be behind in sensor technology.
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Panasonic GX9 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Panasonic GX9 Specifications
Olympus SP-800 UZ | Panasonic Lumix DC-GX9 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus SP-800 UZ | Panasonic Lumix DC-GX9 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2010-02-02 | 2018-02-13 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 20MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5184 x 3888 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 1000 | - |
Min native ISO | 64 | 200 |
RAW pictures | ||
Min enhanced ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 143 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens focal range | 28-840mm (30.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 1,240 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,760 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 12 seconds | 60 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Max quiet shutter speed | - | 1/16000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 10.0 frames per second | 9.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.10 m | 6.00 m (at ISO 200) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, forced on, forced on w/redeye reduction, slow sync, slow sync w/redeye reduction, forced off |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 455g (1.00 lb) | 407g (0.90 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") | 124 x 72 x 47mm (4.9" x 2.8" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 260 images |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 photos over 10 secs) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $270 | $1,000 |