Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh GR Digital IV
69 Imaging
36 Features
35 Overall
35


92 Imaging
35 Features
47 Overall
39
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Push to 1000)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Launched February 2010
- Newer Model is Olympus SP-810 UZ
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Introduced September 2011
- Superseded the Ricoh GR Digital III

Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Overview
Following is a in depth overview of the Olympus SP-800 UZ and Ricoh GR Digital IV, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. There is a substantial difference among the resolutions of the SP-800 UZ (14MP) and GR Digital IV (10MP) and the SP-800 UZ (1/2.3") and GR Digital IV (1/1.7") feature totally different sensor sizes.

The SP-800 UZ was brought out 19 months earlier than the GR Digital IV which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a detailed comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the SP-800 UZ matches up against the GR Digital IV with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus SP-800 UZ & Ricoh GR Digital IV. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery & Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-800 UZ over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
SP-800 UZ | GR Digital IV |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Olympus SP-800 UZ
GR Digital IV | SP-800 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2011 | ![]() | February 2010 | More modern by 19 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Screen resolution | 1230k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+1000k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SP-800 UZ and Ricoh GR Digital IV
SP-800 UZ | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry around your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor its weight and size. The Olympus SP-800 UZ offers outer measurements of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") with a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GR Digital IV has specifications of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Check the Olympus SP-800 UZ and Ricoh GR Digital IV in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have at that time. Below is the front view proportions comparison of the SP-800 UZ against the GR Digital IV.

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the SP-800 UZ and GR Digital IV is 69 and 92 respectively.

Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be tough to visualise the difference in sensor sizes just by viewing specs. The pic here will offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the SP-800 UZ and GR Digital IV.
All in all, both of the cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The SP-800 UZ because of its smaller sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field tougher and the Olympus SP-800 UZ will result in extra detail having its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The more aged SP-800 UZ will be behind in sensor innovation.

Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Specifications
Olympus SP-800 UZ | Ricoh GR Digital IV | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus SP-800 UZ | Ricoh GR Digital IV |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2010-02-02 | 2011-09-15 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 10MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Highest boosted ISO | 1000 | - |
Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 143 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-840mm (30.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | f/1.9 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 1,230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 12s | 1s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 10.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.10 m | 3.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 455 gr (1.00 pounds) | 190 gr (0.42 pounds) |
Dimensions | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 390 shots |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-50B | DB65 |
Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $270 | $599 |