Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh GR III
69 Imaging
36 Features
35 Overall
35
90 Imaging
67 Features
62 Overall
65
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh GR III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Boost to 1000)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Released February 2010
- Newer Model is Olympus SP-810 UZ
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 102400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16) lens
- 257g - 109 x 62 x 33mm
- Launched September 2018
- Superseded the Ricoh GR III
- Renewed by Ricoh GR III
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh GR III Overview
Here, we will be analyzing the Olympus SP-800 UZ versus Ricoh GR III, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a crucial gap between the sensor resolutions of the SP-800 UZ (14MP) and GR III (24MP) and the SP-800 UZ (1/2.3") and GR III (APS-C) have different sensor dimensions.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe SP-800 UZ was brought out 9 years before the GR III which is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus SP-800 UZ being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GR III being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before diving right into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief summation of how the SP-800 UZ scores versus the GR III in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh GR III Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus SP-800 UZ and Ricoh GR III. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery and Ricoh GR III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-800 UZ over the Ricoh GR III
| SP-800 UZ | GR III |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR III over the Olympus SP-800 UZ
| GR III | SP-800 UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | September 2018 | February 2010 | Newer by 105 months | |
| Focus manually | More accurate focusing | |||
| Screen resolution | 1037k | 230k | Clearer screen (+807k dot) | |
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus SP-800 UZ and Ricoh GR III
| SP-800 UZ | GR III | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen sizing | |
| Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen |
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh GR III Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to travel with your camera often, you are going to need to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus SP-800 UZ enjoys outer dimensions of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GR III has proportions of 109mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") along with a weight of 257 grams (0.57 lbs).
Check out the Olympus SP-800 UZ versus Ricoh GR III in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have attached during that time. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the SP-800 UZ against the GR III.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SP-800 UZ and GR III is 69 and 90 respectively.
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh GR III Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its tough to imagine the contrast between sensor dimensions purely by reading specs. The pic underneath may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the SP-800 UZ and GR III.
All in all, both of these cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The SP-800 UZ due to its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field more challenging and the Ricoh GR III will offer extra detail having its extra 10MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures way more aggressively. The more aged SP-800 UZ is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh GR III Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh GR III Specifications
| Olympus SP-800 UZ | Ricoh GR III | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus SP-800 UZ | Ricoh GR III |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2010-02-02 | 2018-09-25 |
| Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 24 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 6000 x 4000 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 102400 |
| Max boosted ISO | 1000 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 143 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-840mm (30.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | f/2.8-16 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 6cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 1,037k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 12 secs | 30 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.10 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 455g (1.00 pounds) | 257g (0.57 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") | 109 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | Li-50B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $270 | $900 |