Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
69 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
88 Imaging
52 Features
37 Overall
46
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Raise to 1000)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Launched February 2010
- Later Model is Olympus SP-810 UZ
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28mm (F2.5) lens
- 140g - 113 x 70 x 56mm
- Announced September 2010
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Overview
Below is a in-depth assessment of the Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the SP-800 UZ (14MP) and the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 (12MP) is very similar but the SP-800 UZ (1/2.3") and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 (APS-C) offer totally different sensor measurements.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe SP-800 UZ was announced 7 months earlier than the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 and they are both of a similar generation. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus SP-800 UZ being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go straight to a full comparison, here is a brief view of how the SP-800 UZ matches up against the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus SP-800 UZ and Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery and Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-800 UZ over the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
SP-800 UZ | GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 over the Olympus SP-800 UZ
GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | SP-800 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2010 | February 2010 | More recent by 7 months | |
Focus manually | Very accurate focus | |||
Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SP-800 UZ and Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
SP-800 UZ | GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display measurements | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Lacking Touch display |
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Physical Comparison
If you are going to lug around your camera often, you have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus SP-800 UZ enjoys outside measurements of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") with a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs) and the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 has dimensions of 113mm x 70mm x 56mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 2.2") accompanied by a weight of 140 grams (0.31 lbs).
Compare the Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Following is a front view scale comparison of the SP-800 UZ and the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the SP-800 UZ and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 is 69 and 88 respectively.
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its tough to see the difference between sensor measurements just by going over technical specs. The visual here will provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the SP-800 UZ and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5.
As you have seen, each of these cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The SP-800 UZ with its tinier sensor will make achieving shallow DOF harder and the Olympus SP-800 UZ will offer extra detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The older SP-800 UZ is going to be behind in sensor technology.
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Specifications
Olympus SP-800 UZ | Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus SP-800 UZ | Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced Mirrorless |
Launched | 2010-02-02 | 2010-09-21 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | GR Engine III |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4288 x 2848 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 1000 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 200 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 143 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-840mm (30.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | f/2.5 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 12 secs | 180 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/3200 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 10.0fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.10 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 455g (1.00 lb) | 140g (0.31 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") | 113 x 70 x 56mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 2.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 320 photographs |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-50B | DB-90 |
Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch price | $270 | $566 |