Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh PX
69 Imaging
36 Features
35 Overall
35


95 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh PX Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Expand to 1000)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Released February 2010
- Updated by Olympus SP-810 UZ
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.4) lens
- 156g - 100 x 55 x 21mm
- Revealed August 2011

Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh PX Overview
Let's examine more in depth at the Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh PX, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the SP-800 UZ (14MP) and the PX (16MP) is fairly comparable and they possess the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").

The SP-800 UZ was announced 18 months before the PX making the cameras a generation away from one another. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a short view of how the SP-800 UZ matches up versus the PX in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh PX Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus SP-800 UZ & Ricoh PX. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery & Ricoh PX Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-800 UZ over the Ricoh PX
SP-800 UZ | PX | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Ricoh PX over the Olympus SP-800 UZ
PX | SP-800 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | August 2011 | ![]() | February 2010 | More modern by 18 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Very accurate focus |
Common features in the Olympus SP-800 UZ and Ricoh PX
SP-800 UZ | PX | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Equal display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither includes Touch display |
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh PX Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry around your camera frequently, you'll need to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus SP-800 UZ features exterior dimensions of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") having a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs) whilst the Ricoh PX has specifications of 100mm x 55mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh PX in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are employing during that time. The following is the front view sizing comparison of the SP-800 UZ compared to the PX.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SP-800 UZ and PX is 69 and 95 respectively.

Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh PX Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is hard to see the difference in sensor sizes just by going through technical specs. The picture here might give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the SP-800 UZ and PX.
As you have seen, each of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same megapixels. You can anticipate the Ricoh PX to provide greater detail with its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The more aged SP-800 UZ will be behind in sensor technology.

Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh PX Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh PX Specifications
Olympus SP-800 UZ | Ricoh PX | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus SP-800 UZ | Ricoh PX |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2010-02-02 | 2011-08-16 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3072 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Highest boosted ISO | 1000 | - |
Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 143 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-840mm (30.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | f/3.9-5.4 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 12 seconds | 8 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.10 m | 3.50 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 455 grams (1.00 lbs) | 156 grams (0.34 lbs) |
Dimensions | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") | 100 x 55 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | Li-50B | DB-100 |
Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail pricing | $270 | $329 |