Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh WG-4
69 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh WG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Expand to 1000)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Launched February 2010
- Newer Model is Olympus SP-810 UZ
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Introduced February 2014
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh WG-4 Overview
Below is a in depth overview of the Olympus SP-800 UZ versus Ricoh WG-4, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof by companies Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the SP-800 UZ (14MP) and the WG-4 (16MP) is relatively comparable and they possess the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingThe SP-800 UZ was brought out 5 years earlier than the WG-4 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a detailed comparison, below is a simple view of how the SP-800 UZ grades vs the WG-4 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh WG-4 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus SP-800 UZ & Ricoh WG-4. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery & Ricoh WG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-800 UZ over the Ricoh WG-4
SP-800 UZ | WG-4 |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Olympus SP-800 UZ
WG-4 | SP-800 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2014 | February 2010 | More recent by 48 months | |
Focus manually | Dial exact focusing | |||
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SP-800 UZ and Ricoh WG-4
SP-800 UZ | WG-4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | No Touch friendly screen |
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh WG-4 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to lug around your camera regularly, you should factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus SP-800 UZ features exterior dimensions of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") along with a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-4 has measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Examine the Olympus SP-800 UZ versus Ricoh WG-4 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are employing at that moment. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the SP-800 UZ against the WG-4.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SP-800 UZ and WG-4 is 69 and 90 respectively.
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh WG-4 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor measurements only by checking out specs. The graphic here will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the SP-800 UZ and WG-4.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same megapixels. You can count on the Ricoh WG-4 to show greater detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures much more aggressively. The older SP-800 UZ will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh WG-4 Specifications
Olympus SP-800 UZ | Ricoh WG-4 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus SP-800 UZ | Ricoh WG-4 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Launched | 2010-02-02 | 2014-02-05 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Max boosted ISO | 1000 | - |
Min native ISO | 64 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 143 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-840mm (30.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 12 secs | 4 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 10.0fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.10 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 455 gr (1.00 pounds) | 230 gr (0.51 pounds) |
Dimensions | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 240 pictures |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Li-50B | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $270 | $330 |