Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS
69 Imaging
36 Features
35 Overall
35
 
               
              90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Raise to 1000)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Launched February 2010
- Successor is Olympus SP-810 UZ
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 236g - 125 x 65 x 32mm
- Introduced February 2015
- Previous Model is Ricoh WG-4 GPS
- Updated by Ricoh WG-6
 Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms        Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Overview
The following is a detailed assessment of the Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the SP-800 UZ (14MP) and the WG-5 GPS (16MP) is fairly close and they enjoy the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
 Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe SP-800 UZ was revealed 6 years earlier than the WG-5 GPS which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving in to a in depth comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the SP-800 UZ scores versus the WG-5 GPS in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
 Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month        Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus SP-800 UZ & Ricoh WG-5 GPS. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery & Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-800 UZ over the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
| SP-800 UZ | WG-5 GPS | 
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-5 GPS over the Olympus SP-800 UZ
| WG-5 GPS | SP-800 UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2015 |  | February 2010 | Newer by 61 months | 
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) | 
Common features in the Olympus SP-800 UZ and Ricoh WG-5 GPS
| SP-800 UZ | WG-5 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display | 
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display measurement | 
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | No Touch display | 
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Physical Comparison
If you're going to travel with your camera often, you will need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus SP-800 UZ has got exterior dimensions of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-5 GPS has proportions of 125mm x 65mm x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") and a weight of 236 grams (0.52 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you use at that time. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the SP-800 UZ and the WG-5 GPS.

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the SP-800 UZ and WG-5 GPS is 69 and 90 respectively.
 
          Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is tough to visualize the difference in sensor dimensions simply by viewing technical specs. The picture here should provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the SP-800 UZ and WG-5 GPS.
As you have seen, both of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different MP. You can anticipate the Ricoh WG-5 GPS to result in more detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop images a little more aggressively. The more aged SP-800 UZ will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
 
          Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
 
         Photography Glossary
Photography Glossary        Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
 Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
 Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
 Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
 Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
 Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
 President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
        
                
        Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Specifications
| Olympus SP-800 UZ | Ricoh WG-5 GPS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Ricoh | 
| Model | Olympus SP-800 UZ | Ricoh WG-5 GPS | 
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof | 
| Launched | 2010-02-02 | 2015-02-10 | 
| Physical type | Compact | Compact | 
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III | - | 
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS | 
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" | 
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² | 
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels | 
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 
| Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 | 
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 | 
| Maximum boosted ISO | 1000 | - | 
| Min native ISO | 64 | 125 | 
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 143 | 9 | 
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens | 
| Lens focal range | 28-840mm (30.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | f/2.0-4.9 | 
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm | 
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 | 
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type | 
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" | 
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 460k dots | 
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None | 
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 12s | 4s | 
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s | 
| Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames/s | 14.0 frames/s | 
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.10 m | 10.40 m (at Auto ISO) | 
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | 
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 | 
| Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 | 
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None | 
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | 
| GPS | None | BuiltIn | 
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 455 grams (1.00 lbs) | 236 grams (0.52 lbs) | 
| Dimensions | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") | 125 x 65 x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested | 
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested | 
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested | 
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested | 
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 photographs | 
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack | 
| Battery model | Li-50B | D-LI92 | 
| Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | 
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | 
| Card slots | 1 | 1 | 
| Price at launch | $270 | $500 | 



