Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh WG-50
69 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh WG-50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Raise to 1000)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Introduced February 2010
- Newer Model is Olympus SP-810 UZ
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Introduced May 2017
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh WG-50 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Olympus SP-800 UZ versus Ricoh WG-50, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Waterproof by brands Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the SP-800 UZ (14MP) and the WG-50 (16MP) is fairly well matched and both cameras have the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe SP-800 UZ was brought out 8 years before the WG-50 which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a full comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the SP-800 UZ scores vs the WG-50 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh WG-50 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus SP-800 UZ and Ricoh WG-50. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery and Ricoh WG-50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-800 UZ over the Ricoh WG-50
SP-800 UZ | WG-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Olympus SP-800 UZ
WG-50 | SP-800 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | May 2017 | February 2010 | Newer by 88 months | |
Manual focus | Very precise focusing |
Common features in the Olympus SP-800 UZ and Ricoh WG-50
SP-800 UZ | WG-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display resolution | 230k | 230k | The same display resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither comes with Touch display |
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh WG-50 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to travel with your camera regularly, you will need to think about its weight and size. The Olympus SP-800 UZ comes with external measurements of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-50 has specifications of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Compare the Olympus SP-800 UZ versus Ricoh WG-50 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the SP-800 UZ compared to the WG-50.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the SP-800 UZ and WG-50 is 69 and 91 respectively.
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh WG-50 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be hard to envision the gap between sensor dimensions merely by reading through technical specs. The image underneath should provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the SP-800 UZ and WG-50.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same resolution. You should anticipate the Ricoh WG-50 to give you more detail having its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images more aggressively. The more aged SP-800 UZ is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh WG-50 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh WG-50 Specifications
Olympus SP-800 UZ | Ricoh WG-50 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus SP-800 UZ | Ricoh WG-50 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2010-02-02 | 2017-05-24 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 1000 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 125 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 143 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-840mm (30.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 12 secs | 4 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 10.0fps | 8.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.10 m | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | On, off |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Yes (Wireless) |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 455g (1.00 lbs) | 193g (0.43 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 shots |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-50B | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $270 | $280 |