Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh WG-6
69 Imaging
36 Features
35 Overall
35


89 Imaging
47 Features
46 Overall
46
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh WG-6 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Push to 1000)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Launched February 2010
- Newer Model is Olympus SP-810 UZ
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 246g - 118 x 66 x 33mm
- Revealed February 2018
- Replaced the Ricoh WG-5 GPS

Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh WG-6 Overview
In this article, we will be comparing the Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh WG-6, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a significant gap among the image resolutions of the SP-800 UZ (14MP) and WG-6 (20MP) but they possess the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").

The SP-800 UZ was launched 9 years prior to the WG-6 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a full comparison, below is a short view of how the SP-800 UZ grades against the WG-6 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh WG-6 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus SP-800 UZ and Ricoh WG-6. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery and Ricoh WG-6 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-800 UZ over the Ricoh WG-6
SP-800 UZ | WG-6 |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-6 over the Olympus SP-800 UZ
WG-6 | SP-800 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2018 | ![]() | February 2010 | Fresher by 98 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+810k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SP-800 UZ and Ricoh WG-6
SP-800 UZ | WG-6 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Lack of Touch screen |
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh WG-6 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry your camera often, you will want to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus SP-800 UZ has exterior measurements of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") and a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-6 has dimensions of 118mm x 66mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") along with a weight of 246 grams (0.54 lbs).
Compare the Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh WG-6 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at that moment. The following is the front view proportions comparison of the SP-800 UZ compared to the WG-6.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SP-800 UZ and WG-6 is 69 and 89 respectively.

Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh WG-6 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor sizing purely by seeing technical specs. The photograph below may give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the SP-800 UZ and WG-6.
As you have seen, each of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different megapixels. You should count on the Ricoh WG-6 to produce more detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs a little more aggressively. The older SP-800 UZ will be behind with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh WG-6 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh WG-6 Specifications
Olympus SP-800 UZ | Ricoh WG-6 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus SP-800 UZ | Ricoh WG-6 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Launched | 2010-02-02 | 2018-02-21 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5184 x 3888 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 1000 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 143 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-840mm (30.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 1,040 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 12 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.10 m | 5.50 m (with Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Flash on, flash off |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840x2160 |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Supports FlashAir SD cards |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | DB-110 lithium-ion battery & USB charger |
GPS | None | Built-in |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 455g (1.00 pounds) | 246g (0.54 pounds) |
Dimensions | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") | 118 x 66 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 340 images |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $270 | $271 |