Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Samsung SL202
69 Imaging
36 Features
35 Overall
35
94 Imaging
32 Features
17 Overall
26
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Push to 1000)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Released February 2010
- Newer Model is Olympus SP-810 UZ
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Revealed February 2009
- Alternative Name is PL50
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Samsung SL202 Overview
Its time to look a little more in depth at the Olympus SP-800 UZ and Samsung SL202, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Samsung. There is a noticeable difference among the resolutions of the SP-800 UZ (14MP) and SL202 (10MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe SP-800 UZ was unveiled 12 months later than the SL202 so they are both of a similar age. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a thorough comparison, here is a simple summation of how the SP-800 UZ matches up against the SL202 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Samsung SL202 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus SP-800 UZ & Samsung SL202. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery & Samsung SL202 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-800 UZ over the Samsung SL202
| SP-800 UZ | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2010 | February 2009 | More recent by 12 months | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Olympus SP-800 UZ
| SL202 | SP-800 UZ |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus SP-800 UZ and Samsung SL202
| SP-800 UZ | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Lack of manual focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 230k | The same display resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Absent Touch friendly display |
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to lug around your camera regularly, you have to think about its weight and size. The Olympus SP-800 UZ comes with external dimensions of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") along with a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs) and the Samsung SL202 has specifications of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
See the Olympus SP-800 UZ and Samsung SL202 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the SP-800 UZ vs the SL202.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the SP-800 UZ and SL202 is 69 and 94 respectively.
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's tough to visualise the gap in sensor measurements only by researching a spec sheet. The photograph underneath will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the SP-800 UZ and SL202.
Clearly, both of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Olympus SP-800 UZ to result in extra detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more recent SP-800 UZ is going to have an edge in sensor innovation.
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Samsung SL202 Specifications
| Olympus SP-800 UZ | Samsung SL202 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus SP-800 UZ | Samsung SL202 |
| Also called as | - | PL50 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2010-02-02 | 2009-02-17 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | 1000 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 143 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-840mm (30.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 12 secs | 8 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.10 m | 4.60 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 455 gr (1.00 pounds) | 168 gr (0.37 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | Li-50B | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $270 | $140 |