Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Samsung SL202
69 Imaging
36 Features
35 Overall
35
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Push to 1000)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Released February 2010
- Newer Model is Olympus SP-810 UZ
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Revealed February 2009
- Alternative Name is PL50
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Samsung SL202 Overview
Its time to look a little more in depth at the Olympus SP-800 UZ and Samsung SL202, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Samsung. There is a noticeable difference among the resolutions of the SP-800 UZ (14MP) and SL202 (10MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe SP-800 UZ was unveiled 12 months later than the SL202 so they are both of a similar age. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a thorough comparison, here is a simple summation of how the SP-800 UZ matches up against the SL202 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Samsung SL202 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus SP-800 UZ & Samsung SL202. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery & Samsung SL202 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-800 UZ over the Samsung SL202
SP-800 UZ | SL202 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2010 | February 2009 | More recent by 12 months | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Olympus SP-800 UZ
SL202 | SP-800 UZ |
---|
Common features in the Olympus SP-800 UZ and Samsung SL202
SP-800 UZ | SL202 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Lack of manual focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display resolution | 230k | 230k | The same display resolution | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Absent Touch friendly display |
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to lug around your camera regularly, you have to think about its weight and size. The Olympus SP-800 UZ comes with external dimensions of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") along with a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs) and the Samsung SL202 has specifications of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
See the Olympus SP-800 UZ and Samsung SL202 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the SP-800 UZ vs the SL202.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the SP-800 UZ and SL202 is 69 and 94 respectively.
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's tough to visualise the gap in sensor measurements only by researching a spec sheet. The photograph underneath will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the SP-800 UZ and SL202.
Clearly, both of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Olympus SP-800 UZ to result in extra detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more recent SP-800 UZ is going to have an edge in sensor innovation.
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Samsung SL202 Specifications
Olympus SP-800 UZ | Samsung SL202 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Samsung |
Model | Olympus SP-800 UZ | Samsung SL202 |
Also called as | - | PL50 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2010-02-02 | 2009-02-17 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 1000 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 143 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-840mm (30.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Max aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | f/2.8-5.7 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 12 secs | 8 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.10 m | 4.60 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 455 gr (1.00 pounds) | 168 gr (0.37 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | Li-50B | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $270 | $140 |