Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Samsung TL500
69 Imaging
36 Features
35 Overall
35
88 Imaging
34 Features
54 Overall
42
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Samsung TL500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Raise to 1000)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Released February 2010
- Replacement is Olympus SP-810 UZ
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F1.8-2.4) lens
- 386g - 114 x 63 x 29mm
- Revealed July 2010
- Also referred to as EX1
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Samsung TL500 Overview
On this page, we are comparing the Olympus SP-800 UZ versus Samsung TL500, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Samsung. There is a sizable difference between the image resolutions of the SP-800 UZ (14MP) and TL500 (10MP) and the SP-800 UZ (1/2.3") and TL500 (1/1.7") offer totally different sensor sizes.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe SP-800 UZ was unveiled 5 months prior to the TL500 and they are of a similar age. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a thorough comparison, here is a short summary of how the SP-800 UZ matches up against the TL500 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Samsung TL500 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus SP-800 UZ & Samsung TL500. The full galleries are available at Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery & Samsung TL500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-800 UZ over the Samsung TL500
SP-800 UZ | TL500 |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung TL500 over the Olympus SP-800 UZ
TL500 | SP-800 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More precise focus | |||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display resolution | 614k | 230k | Sharper display (+384k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Olympus SP-800 UZ and Samsung TL500
SP-800 UZ | TL500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2010 | July 2010 | Similar age | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display dimensions | |
Touch display | Absent Touch display |
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Samsung TL500 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry around your camera, you will want to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus SP-800 UZ features outer dimensions of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") having a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs) and the Samsung TL500 has measurements of 114mm x 63mm x 29mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 386 grams (0.85 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus SP-800 UZ versus Samsung TL500 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you use during that time. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the SP-800 UZ and the TL500.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the SP-800 UZ and TL500 is 69 and 88 respectively.
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Samsung TL500 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its tough to see the gap between sensor sizes purely by reviewing technical specs. The image below should offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the SP-800 UZ and TL500.
As you can tell, both of these cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The SP-800 UZ having a tinier sensor will make shooting shallow DOF tougher and the Olympus SP-800 UZ will deliver more detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images a bit more aggressively.
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Samsung TL500 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Samsung TL500 Specifications
Olympus SP-800 UZ | Samsung TL500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Samsung |
Model | Olympus SP-800 UZ | Samsung TL500 |
Otherwise known as | - | EX1 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2010-02-02 | 2010-07-09 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 10MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 1000 | - |
Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 143 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-840mm (30.0x) | 24-72mm (3.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | f/1.8-2.4 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 614k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 12 secs | 8 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 10.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.10 m | 5.20 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video file format | H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 455 grams (1.00 lbs) | 386 grams (0.85 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") | 114 x 63 x 29mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 40 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 19.2 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.1 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 129 |
Other | ||
Battery model | Li-50B | SLB-07A |
Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC, internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $270 | $527 |