Clicky

Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Samsung WB1100F

Portability
69
Imaging
36
Features
35
Overall
35
Olympus SP-800 UZ front
 
Samsung WB1100F front
Portability
67
Imaging
40
Features
33
Overall
37

Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Samsung WB1100F Key Specs

Olympus SP-800 UZ
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 3200 (Raise to 1000)
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
  • 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
  • Launched February 2010
  • Successor is Olympus SP-810 UZ
Samsung WB1100F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 25-875mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 512g - 125 x 87 x 96mm
  • Released January 2014
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Samsung WB1100F Overview

Here, we will be looking at the Olympus SP-800 UZ versus Samsung WB1100F, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by brands Olympus and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the SP-800 UZ (14MP) and the WB1100F (16MP) is relatively comparable and both cameras offer the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The SP-800 UZ was announced 4 years prior to the WB1100F which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus SP-800 UZ being a Compact camera and the Samsung WB1100F being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before we go straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the SP-800 UZ scores against the WB1100F with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

        

Reasons to pick Olympus SP-800 UZ over the Samsung WB1100F

 SP-800 UZ WB1100F 

Reasons to pick Samsung WB1100F over the Olympus SP-800 UZ

 WB1100F SP-800 UZ 
ReleasedJanuary 2014February 2010More modern by 47 months
Focus manually Dial precise focus
Screen resolution460k230kClearer screen (+230k dot)

Common features in the Olympus SP-800 UZ and Samsung WB1100F

 SP-800 UZ WB1100F 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen size3"3"Same screen dimensions
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch screen Neither provides Touch screen

Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Samsung WB1100F Physical Comparison

If you are going to carry around your camera frequently, you have to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus SP-800 UZ provides outside measurements of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") having a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs) while the Samsung WB1100F has measurements of 125mm x 87mm x 96mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 3.8") accompanied by a weight of 512 grams (1.13 lbs).

Look at the Olympus SP-800 UZ versus Samsung WB1100F in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you use at that time. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the SP-800 UZ and the WB1100F.

Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Samsung WB1100F size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SP-800 UZ and WB1100F is 69 and 67 respectively.

Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Samsung WB1100F top view buttons comparison

Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Samsung WB1100F Sensor Comparison

Quite often, its difficult to imagine the gap in sensor sizes merely by going through technical specs. The picture underneath will give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the SP-800 UZ and WB1100F.

As you have seen, each of the cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different megapixels. You should count on the Samsung WB1100F to show greater detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures way more aggressively. The more aged SP-800 UZ will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.

Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Samsung WB1100F sensor size comparison

Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Samsung WB1100F Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Samsung WB1100F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus SP-800 UZ Portrait photography details
Samsung WB1100F Portrait photography details
28
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
manual focus not available
lack of manual exposure
can't use external flash
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
37
manual focus
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
no manual exposure
no external flash support
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Olympus SP-800 UZ as a Street photography camera
Samsung WB1100F as a Street photography camera
46
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen does not articulate
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
44
image stabilization (Optical)
no moving screen
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
heavier than competition (512g)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Olympus SP-800 UZ Sports photography info
Samsung WB1100F Sports photography info
46
great zoom range (28-840mm 30.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (14MP)
supports tracking focus
no shutter priority
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
45
great zoom range (25-875mm 35.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
continuous shooting slow (1.0 fps)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Olympus SP-800 UZ Travel photography highlights
Samsung WB1100F Travel photography highlights
61
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
decently wide (28mm)
great zoom (840mm)
display isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
54
MP count decent (16MP)
flash built-in
pretty wide (25mm)
very long zoom (875mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
heavier than competition (512g)
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Olympus SP-800 UZ as a Landscape photography camera
Samsung WB1100F as a Landscape photography camera
41
decently wide (28mm)
good sized screen (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
manual focus not available
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
lack of manual exposure
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
45
manual focus
pretty wide (25mm)
screen is a decent size (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
no manual exposure
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
doesn't have Time Lapse function
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus SP-800 UZ
Vlogging with Samsung WB1100F
24
decently wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
display isn't selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 resolution)
doesn't have mic port
23
pretty wide (25mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low quality video (1280 x 720 resolution)
doesn't have mic jack
heavier than competition (512g)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Samsung WB1100F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus SP-800 UZ and Samsung WB1100F
 Olympus SP-800 UZSamsung WB1100F
General Information
Brand Olympus Samsung
Model Olympus SP-800 UZ Samsung WB1100F
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2010-02-02 2014-01-07
Body design Compact SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic III -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio - 4:3 and 16:9
Full resolution 4288 x 3216 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 3200 3200
Max boosted ISO 1000 -
Lowest native ISO 64 80
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points 143 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-840mm (30.0x) 25-875mm (35.0x)
Largest aperture f/2.8-5.6 f/3.0-5.9
Macro focus distance 1cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 230k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 12 secs 8 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 10.0fps 1.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 3.10 m -
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye -
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720
Max video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video format H.264 -
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 455 gr (1.00 lbs) 512 gr (1.13 lbs)
Physical dimensions 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") 125 x 87 x 96mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 3.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model Li-50B SLB-10A
Self timer Yes (12 or 2 sec) -
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC, Internal SD, SDHC, SDXC
Storage slots Single Single
Launch cost $270 $250