Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Samsung WB150F
69 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
93 Imaging
38 Features
42 Overall
39
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Samsung WB150F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Bump to 1000)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Announced February 2010
- New Model is Olympus SP-810 UZ
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 188g - 107 x 61 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2012
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Samsung WB150F Overview
In this article, we will be matching up the Olympus SP-800 UZ and Samsung WB150F, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by brands Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the SP-800 UZ (14MP) and the WB150F (14MP) is relatively close and they enjoy the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe SP-800 UZ was brought out 23 months prior to the WB150F which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a detailed comparison, below is a simple overview of how the SP-800 UZ scores vs the WB150F for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Samsung WB150F Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus SP-800 UZ & Samsung WB150F. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery & Samsung WB150F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-800 UZ over the Samsung WB150F
| SP-800 UZ | WB150F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB150F over the Olympus SP-800 UZ
| WB150F | SP-800 UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2012 |  | February 2010 | More recent by 23 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SP-800 UZ and Samsung WB150F
| SP-800 UZ | WB150F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither features Touch screen |
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Samsung WB150F Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to lug around your camera often, you'll have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus SP-800 UZ enjoys outside measurements of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") having a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs) while the Samsung WB150F has measurements of 107mm x 61mm x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 188 grams (0.41 lbs).
Examine the Olympus SP-800 UZ and Samsung WB150F in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the SP-800 UZ against the WB150F.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the SP-800 UZ and WB150F is 69 and 93 respectively.
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Samsung WB150F Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be tough to see the contrast in sensor measurements just by researching technical specs. The photograph underneath may give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the SP-800 UZ and WB150F.
As you can tell, the two cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the exact same resolution and you can expect comparable quality of photos however you might want to take the age of the cameras into account. The older SP-800 UZ will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Samsung WB150F Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Samsung WB150F Specifications
| Olympus SP-800 UZ | Samsung WB150F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus SP-800 UZ | Samsung WB150F |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2010-02-02 | 2012-01-09 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Max boosted ISO | 1000 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 143 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-840mm (30.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 12 secs | 16 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.10 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 455 gr (1.00 lbs) | 188 gr (0.41 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") | 107 x 61 x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | Li-50B | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $270 | $230 |
