Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Samsung WB2200F
69 Imaging
36 Features
35 Overall
35
 
               
              59 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Samsung WB2200F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Raise to 1000)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Announced February 2010
- Refreshed by Olympus SP-810 UZ
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 20-1200mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 708g - 119 x 122 x 99mm
- Announced January 2014
 Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide        Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Samsung WB2200F Overview
Let's look a bit more closely at the Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Samsung WB2200F, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the SP-800 UZ (14MP) and the WB2200F (16MP) is pretty well matched and they feature the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
 President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe SP-800 UZ was released 4 years before the WB2200F which is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus SP-800 UZ being a Compact camera and the Samsung WB2200F being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving through a in depth comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the SP-800 UZ matches up versus the WB2200F when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
 Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards        Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Samsung WB2200F Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus SP-800 UZ and Samsung WB2200F. The complete galleries are available at Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery and Samsung WB2200F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-800 UZ over the Samsung WB2200F
| SP-800 UZ | WB2200F | 
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB2200F over the Olympus SP-800 UZ
| WB2200F | SP-800 UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2014 |  | February 2010 | More modern by 47 months | 
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) | 
Common features in the Olympus SP-800 UZ and Samsung WB2200F
| SP-800 UZ | WB2200F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen | 
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen measurements | 
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither offers Touch screen | 
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Samsung WB2200F Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry around your camera often, you will want to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus SP-800 UZ offers exterior measurements of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") and a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs) and the Samsung WB2200F has measurements of 119mm x 122mm x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") accompanied by a weight of 708 grams (1.56 lbs).
Compare the Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Samsung WB2200F in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the SP-800 UZ against the WB2200F.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SP-800 UZ and WB2200F is 69 and 59 respectively.
 
          Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Samsung WB2200F Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very difficult to see the difference between sensor sizes purely by reading through specifications. The image here will provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the SP-800 UZ and WB2200F.
Plainly, the 2 cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same megapixels. You should expect the Samsung WB2200F to resolve greater detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs much more aggressively. The more aged SP-800 UZ is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
 
          Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Samsung WB2200F Screen and ViewFinder
 
         Photography Glossary
Photography Glossary        Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
 Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
 Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
 Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
 Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
 Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
 Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
        
                
        Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Samsung WB2200F Specifications
| Olympus SP-800 UZ | Samsung WB2200F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung | 
| Model | Olympus SP-800 UZ | Samsung WB2200F | 
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom | 
| Announced | 2010-02-02 | 2014-01-07 | 
| Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) | 
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III | - | 
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS | 
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" | 
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² | 
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels | 
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 | 
| Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 | 
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 | 
| Highest enhanced ISO | 1000 | - | 
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 | 
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 143 | - | 
| Cross focus points | - | - | 
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens | 
| Lens focal range | 28-840mm (30.0x) | 20-1200mm (60.0x) | 
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | f/2.8-5.9 | 
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 10cm | 
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 | 
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type | 
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches | 
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots | 
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT LCD | 
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic | 
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 200k dots | 
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 12s | 1/8s | 
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s | 
| Continuous shutter rate | 10.0 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s | 
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes | 
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.10 m | 6.00 m (ISO Auto) | 
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash Off, Red-eye fix | 
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920x1080(30fps), 1280x720(30fps), 640x480(30fps), QVGA(30fps, 30s, Streaming) * High Speed : 360fps(176x128), 240fps(384x288) | 
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 | 
| Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD | 
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In | 
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | 
| GPS | None | None | 
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 455 grams (1.00 lbs) | 708 grams (1.56 lbs) | 
| Dimensions | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") | 119 x 122 x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") | 
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested | 
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested | 
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested | 
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested | 
| Other | ||
| Battery model | Li-50B | BP-1410 | 
| Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | - | 
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD, SDHC, SCXC | 
| Card slots | One | One | 
| Cost at release | $270 | $599 | 



