Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Samsung WB250F
69 Imaging
36 Features
35 Overall
35


93 Imaging
38 Features
44 Overall
40
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Samsung WB250F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Push to 1000)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Introduced February 2010
- Replacement is Olympus SP-810 UZ
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 226g - 106 x 62 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2013

Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Samsung WB250F Overview
In this write-up, we are reviewing the Olympus SP-800 UZ and Samsung WB250F, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by rivals Olympus and Samsung. The image resolution of the SP-800 UZ (14MP) and the WB250F (14MP) is fairly well matched and they come with the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").

The SP-800 UZ was launched 3 years before the WB250F which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going in to a full comparison, below is a quick view of how the SP-800 UZ matches up versus the WB250F for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Samsung WB250F Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus SP-800 UZ & Samsung WB250F. The complete galleries are available at Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery & Samsung WB250F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-800 UZ over the Samsung WB250F
SP-800 UZ | WB250F |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB250F over the Olympus SP-800 UZ
WB250F | SP-800 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2013 | ![]() | February 2010 | More modern by 35 months |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus SP-800 UZ and Samsung WB250F
SP-800 UZ | WB250F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | No manual focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Samsung WB250F Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry around your camera often, you need to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus SP-800 UZ offers external dimensions of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") with a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB250F has sizing of 106mm x 62mm x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).
Look at the Olympus SP-800 UZ and Samsung WB250F in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are using at that moment. Underneath is the front view size comparison of the SP-800 UZ compared to the WB250F.

Considering size and weight, the portability score of the SP-800 UZ and WB250F is 69 and 93 respectively.

Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Samsung WB250F Sensor Comparison
Often, it's tough to visualize the contrast between sensor sizes just by looking at technical specs. The image below might provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the SP-800 UZ and WB250F.
As you can tell, both of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the same exact resolution and you can expect similar quality of pictures though you might want to consider the age of the products into consideration. The more aged SP-800 UZ is going to be behind in sensor innovation.

Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Samsung WB250F Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Samsung WB250F Specifications
Olympus SP-800 UZ | Samsung WB250F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Samsung |
Model | Olympus SP-800 UZ | Samsung WB250F |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2010-02-02 | 2013-01-07 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4320 x 3240 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Highest boosted ISO | 1000 | - |
Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 143 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-840mm (30.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | f/3.2-5.8 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 12 secs | 16 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 10.0fps | 8.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.10 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 455 grams (1.00 lbs) | 226 grams (0.50 lbs) |
Dimensions | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") | 106 x 62 x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | Li-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $270 | $250 |