Clicky

Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Samsung WB35F

Portability
69
Imaging
36
Features
35
Overall
35
Olympus SP-800 UZ front
 
Samsung WB35F front
Portability
93
Imaging
40
Features
33
Overall
37

Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs

Olympus SP-800 UZ
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 3200 (Boost to 1000)
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
  • 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
  • Released February 2010
  • New Model is Olympus SP-810 UZ
Samsung WB35F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
  • 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
  • Launched January 2014
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Samsung WB35F Overview

In this write-up, we are contrasting the Olympus SP-800 UZ and Samsung WB35F, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by brands Olympus and Samsung. The image resolution of the SP-800 UZ (14MP) and the WB35F (16MP) is very similar and they feature the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The SP-800 UZ was manufactured 4 years prior to the WB35F which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before we go in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the SP-800 UZ matches up vs the WB35F with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

        

Reasons to pick Olympus SP-800 UZ over the Samsung WB35F

 SP-800 UZ WB35F 
Display sizing3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")

Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Olympus SP-800 UZ

 WB35F SP-800 UZ 
LaunchedJanuary 2014February 2010Newer by 47 months
Focus manually More exact focusing

Common features in the Olympus SP-800 UZ and Samsung WB35F

 SP-800 UZ WB35F 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display resolution230k230kEqual display resolution
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither contains Touch friendly display

Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison

When you are planning to travel with your camera often, you should factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus SP-800 UZ has got outside dimensions of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") and a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs) and the Samsung WB35F has proportions of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus SP-800 UZ and Samsung WB35F in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have attached at that time. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the SP-800 UZ and the WB35F.

Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Samsung WB35F size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the SP-800 UZ and WB35F is 69 and 93 respectively.

Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Samsung WB35F top view buttons comparison

Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison

Usually, it is very hard to imagine the difference between sensor dimensions only by reviewing a spec sheet. The image underneath will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the SP-800 UZ and WB35F.

As you can see, both cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different megapixels. You can expect to see the Samsung WB35F to offer greater detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics a little more aggressively. The more aged SP-800 UZ is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Samsung WB35F sensor size comparison

Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Samsung WB35F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus SP-800 UZ Portrait photography factors
Samsung WB35F Portrait photography factors
28
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not possible
external flash not possible
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
37
manual focus
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
no manual mode
cannot use external flash
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Olympus SP-800 UZ Street photography info
Samsung WB35F Street photography info
46
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
62
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (194 grams)
screen is fixed
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Olympus SP-800 UZ Sports photography details
Samsung WB35F Sports photography details
46
amazing zoom range (28-840mm 30.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
provides tracking focus
no shutter priority
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
40
image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
no shutter priority
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Olympus SP-800 UZ as a Travel photography camera
Samsung WB35F as a Travel photography camera
61
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
flash built-in
really wide (28mm)
great zoom (840mm)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
70
lighter than competition (194 grams)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
flash built-in
rather wide (24mm)
very long reach (288mm)
missing Timelapse mode
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Olympus SP-800 UZ Landscape photography factors
Samsung WB35F Landscape photography factors
41
really wide (28mm)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
manual exposure not possible
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
43
manual focus
rather wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
tiny screen (2.7")
no manual mode
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
missing Timelapse mode
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus SP-800 UZ Vlogging details
Samsung WB35F Vlogging details
24
really wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
video quality not great (1280 x 720 resolution)
no mic socket
31
rather wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (194g)
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing microphone jack
Photography Glossary

Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Samsung WB35F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus SP-800 UZ and Samsung WB35F
 Olympus SP-800 UZSamsung WB35F
General Information
Make Olympus Samsung
Model type Olympus SP-800 UZ Samsung WB35F
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Released 2010-02-02 2014-01-07
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic III -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio - 4:3 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4288 x 3216 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 3200 3200
Highest boosted ISO 1000 -
Min native ISO 64 80
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Total focus points 143 -
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-840mm (30.0x) 24-288mm (12.0x)
Maximum aperture f/2.8-5.6 f/3.1-6.3
Macro focusing range 1cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inches 2.7 inches
Screen resolution 230k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 12 secs 8 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 10.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 3.10 m -
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye -
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video data format H.264 -
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 455 gr (1.00 lb) 194 gr (0.43 lb)
Dimensions 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID Li-50B BP70A
Self timer Yes (12 or 2 sec) -
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC, Internal MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC
Storage slots 1 1
Pricing at launch $270 $130