Clicky

Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony A230

Portability
69
Imaging
37
Features
35
Overall
36
Olympus SP-800 UZ front
 
Sony Alpha DSLR-A230 front
Portability
69
Imaging
50
Features
40
Overall
46

Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony A230 Key Specs

Olympus SP-800 UZ
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 3200 (Increase to 1000)
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
  • 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
  • Revealed February 2010
  • Renewed by Olympus SP-810 UZ
Sony A230
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 490g - 128 x 97 x 68mm
  • Announced May 2009
  • Old Model is Sony A200
  • Replacement is Sony A290
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony A230 Overview

Here, we will be reviewing the Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony A230, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Olympus and Sony. There is a large difference among the resolutions of the SP-800 UZ (14MP) and A230 (10MP) and the SP-800 UZ (1/2.3") and A230 (APS-C) have totally different sensor dimensions.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The SP-800 UZ was manufactured 9 months after the A230 which means that they are of a similar age. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus SP-800 UZ being a Compact camera and the Sony A230 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before delving into a complete comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the SP-800 UZ matches up versus the A230 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus SP-800 UZ over the Sony A230

 SP-800 UZ A230 
AnnouncedFebruary 2010May 2009More modern by 9 months
Screen size3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")

Reasons to pick Sony A230 over the Olympus SP-800 UZ

 A230 SP-800 UZ 
Focus manually Very accurate focusing

Common features in the Olympus SP-800 UZ and Sony A230

 SP-800 UZ A230 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen resolution230k230kThe same screen resolution
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch screen Lack of Touch screen

Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony A230 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is intending to carry around your camera frequently, you are going to need to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus SP-800 UZ features external dimensions of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs) whilst the Sony A230 has sizing of 128mm x 97mm x 68mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.7") accompanied by a weight of 490 grams (1.08 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony A230 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are using at the time. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the SP-800 UZ against the A230.

Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony A230 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the SP-800 UZ and A230 is 69 and 69 respectively.

Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony A230 top view buttons comparison

Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony A230 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it's tough to visualise the difference in sensor sizes only by checking out specifications. The pic below might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the SP-800 UZ and A230.

Plainly, both the cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The SP-800 UZ featuring a smaller sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field trickier and the Olympus SP-800 UZ will provide more detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs way more aggressively. The newer SP-800 UZ is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony A230 sensor size comparison

Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony A230 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony A230 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus SP-800 UZ Portrait photography factors
Sony A230 Portrait photography factors
28
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
manual focus not available
manual mode not available
external flash not possible
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
54
you can focus manually
nice sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
does not have liveview
MP count low (10MP)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus SP-800 UZ
Street photography with Sony A230
46
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
67
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
no moving screen
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Olympus SP-800 UZ Sports photography information
Sony A230 Sports photography information
47
incredible zoom range (28-840mm 30.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (14MP)
has tracking autofocus
no shutter priority mode
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
46
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
has phase detect auto focus
does not have liveview
continuous shooting slow (3.0 frames per second)
MP count low (10MP)
low battery power (230 shots)
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus SP-800 UZ
Travel photography with Sony A230
61
decent megapixels (14MP)
has built in flash
rather wide (28mm)
very long zoom (840mm)
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
45
flash built-in
doesn't have Timelapse recording
low battery power (230 per charge)
MP count low (10 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus SP-800 UZ
Landscape photography with Sony A230
41
rather wide (28mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
manual mode not available
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
51
you can focus manually
change lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inches)
does not have liveview
MP count low (10MP)
low battery power (230 per charge)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus SP-800 UZ
Vlogging with Sony A230
24
rather wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
video res low (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of external mic socket
9
no video
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony A230 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus SP-800 UZ and Sony A230
 Olympus SP-800 UZSony Alpha DSLR-A230
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus SP-800 UZ Sony Alpha DSLR-A230
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Entry-Level DSLR
Revealed 2010-02-02 2009-05-18
Physical type Compact Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic III Bionz
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio - 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4288 x 3216 3872 x 2592
Highest native ISO 3200 3200
Highest boosted ISO 1000 -
Minimum native ISO 64 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points 143 9
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens Sony/Minolta Alpha
Lens zoom range 28-840mm (30.0x) -
Maximal aperture f/2.8-5.6 -
Macro focusing distance 1cm -
Total lenses - 143
Crop factor 5.8 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3" 2.7"
Screen resolution 230 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage - 95%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.55x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 12s 30s
Highest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/4000s
Continuous shooting rate 10.0fps 3.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 3.10 m 10.00 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Wireless
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Highest flash synchronize - 1/160s
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) -
Highest video resolution 1280x720 None
Video data format H.264 -
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 455 gr (1.00 lbs) 490 gr (1.08 lbs)
Physical dimensions 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") 128 x 97 x 68mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 63
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 22.3
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 11.4
DXO Low light rating not tested 531
Other
Battery life - 230 photographs
Battery type - Battery Pack
Battery ID Li-50B NP-FH50
Self timer Yes (12 or 2 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC, Internal SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo
Card slots Single Single
Cost at launch $270 $569