Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony A290
69 Imaging
36 Features
35 Overall
35
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/86e58/86e58dbdc1df53889f3e4aef4918a9ae36fe6ab0" alt="Olympus SP-800 UZ front Olympus SP-800 UZ front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0798d/0798ddacd7eeb1289b58370a77a8d66bd4ccddbb" alt="Sony Alpha DSLR-A290 front Sony Alpha DSLR-A290 front"
66 Imaging
54 Features
47 Overall
51
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony A290 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Raise to 1000)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Announced February 2010
- Replacement is Olympus SP-810 UZ
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 549g - 128 x 97 x 86mm
- Announced June 2010
- Succeeded the Sony A230
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony A290 Overview
On this page, we are comparing the Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony A290, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by brands Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the SP-800 UZ (14MP) and the A290 (14MP) is fairly close but the SP-800 UZ (1/2.3") and A290 (APS-C) boast different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The SP-800 UZ was announced 4 months before the A290 so they are of a similar age. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus SP-800 UZ being a Compact camera and the Sony A290 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before going into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the SP-800 UZ grades versus the A290 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony A290 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus SP-800 UZ & Sony Alpha DSLR-A290. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery & Sony A290 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-800 UZ over the Sony A290
SP-800 UZ | A290 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Sony A290 over the Olympus SP-800 UZ
A290 | SP-800 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More precise focus |
Common features in the Olympus SP-800 UZ and Sony A290
SP-800 UZ | A290 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2010 | ![]() | June 2010 | Same age |
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Exact same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither features Touch friendly display |
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony A290 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to travel with your camera, you should factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus SP-800 UZ enjoys exterior measurements of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") having a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs) while the Sony A290 has dimensions of 128mm x 97mm x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") along with a weight of 549 grams (1.21 lbs).
Look at the Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony A290 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have chosen at the time. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the SP-800 UZ versus the A290.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e5c76/e5c765c00f50d77471cbda6f1ce0c13e90963db1" alt="Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony A290 size comparison Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony A290 size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SP-800 UZ and A290 is 69 and 66 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/78f61/78f6126460726ee9a5523eac75bf0ef01d573be1" alt="Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony A290 top view buttons comparison Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony A290 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony A290 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is difficult to picture the contrast in sensor dimensions merely by viewing a spec sheet. The image underneath may provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the SP-800 UZ and A290.
Clearly, the two cameras provide the same megapixel count but different sensor dimensions. The SP-800 UZ has got the smaller sensor which will make getting shallower DOF harder.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e66f1/e66f1c7ef0c9419140c090b56b10a232b062e2a2" alt="Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony A290 sensor size comparison Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony A290 sensor size comparison"
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony A290 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5b0bb/5b0bbdf4b3e7e71e6c8a5d3fb3461c8a7fe6d099" alt="Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony A290 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony A290 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony A290 Specifications
Olympus SP-800 UZ | Sony Alpha DSLR-A290 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus SP-800 UZ | Sony Alpha DSLR-A290 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level DSLR |
Announced | 2010-02-02 | 2010-06-09 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4592 x 3056 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Max boosted ISO | 1000 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 143 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens focal range | 28-840mm (30.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 143 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.55x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 12s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.10 m | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
Video data format | H.264 | - |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 455 grams (1.00 lbs) | 549 grams (1.21 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") | 128 x 97 x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 66 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.6 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.5 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 615 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 290 images |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-50B | NP-FH50 |
Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo, SD/SDHC |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $270 | $600 |