Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony NEX-C3
69 Imaging
36 Features
35 Overall
35
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/86e58/86e58dbdc1df53889f3e4aef4918a9ae36fe6ab0" alt="Olympus SP-800 UZ front Olympus SP-800 UZ front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2cec1/2cec10f20284888a461f10799c9bdd17f4863091" alt="Sony Alpha NEX-C3 front Sony Alpha NEX-C3 front"
91 Imaging
56 Features
57 Overall
56
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony NEX-C3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Boost to 1000)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Released February 2010
- Replacement is Olympus SP-810 UZ
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- 1280 x 720 video
- Sony E Mount
- 225g - 110 x 60 x 33mm
- Launched August 2011
- Old Model is Sony NEX-3
- Successor is Sony NEX-F3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony NEX-C3 Overview
Following is a comprehensive analysis of the Olympus SP-800 UZ versus Sony NEX-C3, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the SP-800 UZ (14MP) and the NEX-C3 (16MP) is fairly well matched but the SP-800 UZ (1/2.3") and NEX-C3 (APS-C) come with different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The SP-800 UZ was manufactured 18 months earlier than the NEX-C3 making the cameras a generation away from one another. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus SP-800 UZ being a Compact camera and the Sony NEX-C3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving through a in depth comparison, below is a concise overview of how the SP-800 UZ scores versus the NEX-C3 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony NEX-C3 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus SP-800 UZ and Sony Alpha NEX-C3. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery and Sony NEX-C3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-800 UZ over the Sony NEX-C3
SP-800 UZ | NEX-C3 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-C3 over the Olympus SP-800 UZ
NEX-C3 | SP-800 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2011 | ![]() | February 2010 | More modern by 18 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SP-800 UZ and Sony NEX-C3
SP-800 UZ | NEX-C3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony NEX-C3 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry around your camera often, you should factor its weight and volume. The Olympus SP-800 UZ enjoys outer dimensions of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") and a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs) while the Sony NEX-C3 has sizing of 110mm x 60mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).
Check out the Olympus SP-800 UZ versus Sony NEX-C3 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you choose at that time. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the SP-800 UZ against the NEX-C3.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f1b6f/f1b6fe1b9504516a68d58ffae59adeb0782ba201" alt="Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony NEX-C3 size comparison Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony NEX-C3 size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SP-800 UZ and NEX-C3 is 69 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8b976/8b9762ebbe35fbcf18582644b6d14f059aecd939" alt="Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony NEX-C3 top view buttons comparison Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony NEX-C3 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony NEX-C3 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its tough to visualize the contrast between sensor sizes only by reading through a spec sheet. The picture underneath should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the SP-800 UZ and NEX-C3.
As you can see, both the cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The SP-800 UZ because of its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field tougher and the Sony NEX-C3 will give you greater detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The more aged SP-800 UZ is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2594b/2594ba6208117f7d500fae9f97e498aa2d5cf23a" alt="Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony NEX-C3 sensor size comparison Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony NEX-C3 sensor size comparison"
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony NEX-C3 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0cf60/0cf608a575eb073ba2d84b3f18a3bfda0835214c" alt="Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony NEX-C3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony NEX-C3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony NEX-C3 Specifications
Olympus SP-800 UZ | Sony Alpha NEX-C3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus SP-800 UZ | Sony Alpha NEX-C3 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2010-02-02 | 2011-08-22 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4912 x 3264 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Max enhanced ISO | 1000 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 143 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens zoom range | 28-840mm (30.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT Xtra Fine LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 12 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 10.0 frames per second | 6.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.10 m | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 455 grams (1.00 pounds) | 225 grams (0.50 pounds) |
Dimensions | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") | 110 x 60 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 73 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.2 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1083 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 400 shots |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Li-50B | NPFW50 |
Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $270 | $343 |