Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony A6300
69 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
83 Imaging
67 Features
82 Overall
73
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony A6300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Expand to 1000)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Announced February 2010
- Later Model is Olympus SP-810 UZ
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Push to 51200)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 404g - 120 x 67 x 49mm
- Revealed February 2016
- Superseded the Sony A6000
- Newer Model is Sony A6500
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony A6300 Overview
Lets look closer at the Olympus SP-800 UZ and Sony A6300, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There exists a large gap among the sensor resolutions of the SP-800 UZ (14MP) and A6300 (24MP) and the SP-800 UZ (1/2.3") and A6300 (APS-C) come with different sensor sizing.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe SP-800 UZ was brought out 7 years before the A6300 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus SP-800 UZ being a Compact camera and the Sony A6300 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go straight into a full comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the SP-800 UZ grades against the A6300 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony A6300 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus SP-800 UZ & Sony Alpha a6300. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery & Sony A6300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-800 UZ over the Sony A6300
SP-800 UZ | A6300 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony A6300 over the Olympus SP-800 UZ
A6300 | SP-800 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2016 | February 2010 | Newer by 73 months | |
Manual focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 922k | 230k | Sharper screen (+692k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SP-800 UZ and Sony A6300
SP-800 UZ | A6300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen measurement | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony A6300 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to travel with your camera often, you need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus SP-800 UZ enjoys physical measurements of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") with a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs) and the Sony A6300 has dimensions of 120mm x 67mm x 49mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.9") along with a weight of 404 grams (0.89 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus SP-800 UZ and Sony A6300 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you select at that time. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the SP-800 UZ vs the A6300.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SP-800 UZ and A6300 is 69 and 83 respectively.
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony A6300 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's hard to picture the difference in sensor dimensions merely by viewing a spec sheet. The picture below may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the SP-800 UZ and A6300.
Clearly, both of those cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The SP-800 UZ due to its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF more difficult and the Sony A6300 will provide you with more detail having its extra 10MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The more aged SP-800 UZ will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony A6300 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony A6300 Specifications
Olympus SP-800 UZ | Sony Alpha a6300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus SP-800 UZ | Sony Alpha a6300 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced Mirrorless |
Announced | 2010-02-02 | 2016-02-03 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | BIONZ X |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 24MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 6000 x 4000 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 1000 | 51200 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 143 | 425 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens zoom range | 28-840mm (30.0x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 922k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 12s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 10.0 frames per sec | 11.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.10 m | 6.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Flash off, Autoflash, Fill-flash, Rear Sync., Slow Sync., Red-eye reduction, Hi-speed sync, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 4K (3840 x 2160 @ 30p/24p), 1920 x 1080 (120p, 60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (24p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 455g (1.00 lbs) | 404g (0.89 lbs) |
Dimensions | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") | 120 x 67 x 49mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 85 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 24.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.7 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1437 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 400 images |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Li-50B | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | With downloadable app | |
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $270 | $889 |