Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony RX10 III
69 Imaging
36 Features
35 Overall
35
53 Imaging
52 Features
77 Overall
62
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony RX10 III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Bump to 1000)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Released February 2010
- Updated by Olympus SP-810 UZ
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-600mm (F2.4-4.0) lens
- 1051g - 133 x 94 x 127mm
- Introduced March 2016
- Superseded the Sony RX10 II
- Successor is Sony RX10 IV
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony RX10 III Overview
Here is a complete assessment of the Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony RX10 III, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Large Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Sony. There exists a big gap among the sensor resolutions of the SP-800 UZ (14MP) and RX10 III (20MP) and the SP-800 UZ (1/2.3") and RX10 III (1") use different sensor sizes.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe SP-800 UZ was unveiled 7 years before the RX10 III and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus SP-800 UZ being a Compact camera and the Sony RX10 III being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving through a detailed comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the SP-800 UZ matches up vs the RX10 III with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony RX10 III Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus SP-800 UZ and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery and Sony RX10 III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-800 UZ over the Sony RX10 III
SP-800 UZ | RX10 III |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony RX10 III over the Olympus SP-800 UZ
RX10 III | SP-800 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | March 2016 | February 2010 | Fresher by 74 months | |
Manual focus | Very exact focus | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 1229k | 230k | Crisper display (+999k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SP-800 UZ and Sony RX10 III
SP-800 UZ | RX10 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Missing Touch friendly display |
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony RX10 III Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry your camera regularly, you will want to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus SP-800 UZ provides outside measurements of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") along with a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs) whilst the Sony RX10 III has measurements of 133mm x 94mm x 127mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.0") along with a weight of 1051 grams (2.32 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony RX10 III in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you use during that time. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the SP-800 UZ versus the RX10 III.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SP-800 UZ and RX10 III is 69 and 53 respectively.
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony RX10 III Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor sizing just by viewing a spec sheet. The photograph below will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the SP-800 UZ and RX10 III.
As you can see, the 2 cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The SP-800 UZ with its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF more challenging and the Sony RX10 III will provide you with extra detail having an extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images much more aggressively. The older SP-800 UZ will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony RX10 III Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony RX10 III Specifications
Olympus SP-800 UZ | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus SP-800 UZ | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2010-02-02 | 2016-03-29 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Highest boosted ISO | 1000 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | - | 64 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 143 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-840mm (30.0x) | 24-600mm (25.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | f/2.4-4.0 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 1,229 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 12s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | - | 1/32000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 10.0fps | 14.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.10 m | 10.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 455 gr (1.00 lb) | 1051 gr (2.32 lb) |
Dimensions | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") | 133 x 94 x 127mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 70 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.1 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.6 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 472 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 420 photos |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-50B | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $270 | $1,398 |