Clicky

Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony RX1R II

Portability
69
Imaging
36
Features
35
Overall
35
Olympus SP-800 UZ front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R II front
Portability
78
Imaging
75
Features
65
Overall
71

Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony RX1R II Key Specs

Olympus SP-800 UZ
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 3200 (Increase to 1000)
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
  • 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
  • Released February 2010
  • Later Model is Olympus SP-810 UZ
Sony RX1R II
(Full Review)
  • 42MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 50 - 25600 (Boost to 102400)
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 35mm (F2.0) lens
  • 507g - 113 x 65 x 72mm
  • Introduced October 2015
  • Earlier Model is Sony RX1R
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony RX1R II Overview

Here, we are evaluating the Olympus SP-800 UZ and Sony RX1R II, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Sony. There is a large difference among the resolutions of the SP-800 UZ (14MP) and RX1R II (42MP) and the SP-800 UZ (1/2.3") and RX1R II (Full frame) offer different sensor dimensions.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The SP-800 UZ was brought out 6 years before the RX1R II and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus SP-800 UZ being a Compact camera and the Sony RX1R II being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before getting into a complete comparison, here is a brief summation of how the SP-800 UZ scores versus the RX1R II when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

        

Reasons to pick Olympus SP-800 UZ over the Sony RX1R II

 SP-800 UZ RX1R II 

Reasons to pick Sony RX1R II over the Olympus SP-800 UZ

 RX1R II SP-800 UZ 
IntroducedOctober 2015February 2010More recent by 69 months
Manual focus More exact focusing
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display resolution1229k230kClearer display (+999k dot)

Common features in the Olympus SP-800 UZ and Sony RX1R II

 SP-800 UZ RX1R II 
Display size3"3"Same display sizing
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch display Missing Touch display

Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony RX1R II Physical Comparison

When you are aiming to lug around your camera, you will need to consider its weight and size. The Olympus SP-800 UZ comes with physical measurements of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") having a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs) while the Sony RX1R II has specifications of 113mm x 65mm x 72mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") and a weight of 507 grams (1.12 lbs).

Check out the Olympus SP-800 UZ and Sony RX1R II in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the SP-800 UZ vs the RX1R II.

Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony RX1R II size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the SP-800 UZ and RX1R II is 69 and 78 respectively.

Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony RX1R II top view buttons comparison

Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony RX1R II Sensor Comparison

Generally, its hard to picture the difference in sensor measurements purely by seeing specifications. The photograph underneath should provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the SP-800 UZ and RX1R II.

Plainly, both of those cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The SP-800 UZ featuring a smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF trickier and the Sony RX1R II will produce more detail having its extra 28MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop images way more aggressively. The older SP-800 UZ will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony RX1R II sensor size comparison

Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony RX1R II Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony RX1R II Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus SP-800 UZ as a Portrait photography camera
Sony RX1R II as a Portrait photography camera
28
decent megapixels (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
no manual mode
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
85
focusing manually
above average flash sync (1/4,000s)
MP count fantastic (42 megapixels)
large sensor size (Full frame)
supports face detection autofocus
supports RAW formats
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Olympus SP-800 UZ as a Street photography camera
Sony RX1R II as a Street photography camera
46
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
73
has a tilting screen
large sensor size (Full frame)
supports RAW formats
very good ISO range (25,600)
no image stabilization
heavier than competition in class (507g)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Olympus SP-800 UZ Sports photography information
Sony RX1R II Sports photography information
46
great zoom range (28-840mm 30.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
includes tracking autofocus
no shutter priority mode
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
62
MP count fantastic (42 megapixels)
large sensor size (Full frame)
supports tracking autofocus
comes with phase detect autofocus
can't change focal length (35mm)
max fps very slow (5.0 frames/s)
no image stabilization
not so great battery pack (220 shots)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Olympus SP-800 UZ as a Travel photography camera
Sony RX1R II as a Travel photography camera
61
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (28mm)
very long zoom (840mm)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
59
MP count fantastic (42 megapixels)
very good maximum aperture (f2.0)
lack of Time Lapse recording
not so great battery pack (220 per charge)
heavier than competition in class (507 grams)
screen is not selfie friendly
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Olympus SP-800 UZ as a Landscape photography camera
Sony RX1R II as a Landscape photography camera
41
reasonably wide (28mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
no manual mode
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
68
focusing manually
very good maximum aperture (f2.0)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
MP count fantastic (42 megapixels)
large sensor size (Full frame)
doesnt have anti aliasing filter
very good ISO range (25,600)
supports RAW formats
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (35mm)
no image stabilization
not so great battery pack (220 CIPA)
lack of Time Lapse recording
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus SP-800 UZ
Vlogging with Sony RX1R II
24
reasonably wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
video res low (1280 x 720 resolution)
does not have external mic port
34
very good maximum aperture (f2.0)
supports face detection autofocus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
does have external mic port
screen is not selfie friendly
no image stabilization
heavier than competition in class (507g)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony RX1R II Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus SP-800 UZ and Sony RX1R II
 Olympus SP-800 UZSony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R II
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus SP-800 UZ Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R II
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Large Sensor Compact
Released 2010-02-02 2015-10-13
Body design Compact Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic III BIONZ X
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" Full frame
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 35.9 x 24mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 861.6mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixels 42 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio - 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4288 x 3216 7952 x 5304
Highest native ISO 3200 25600
Highest enhanced ISO 1000 102400
Min native ISO 64 50
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points 143 25
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-840mm (30.0x) 35mm (1x)
Highest aperture f/2.8-5.6 f/2.0
Macro focusing range 1cm 14cm
Crop factor 5.8 1
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Tilting
Screen diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 230 thousand dot 1,229 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,359 thousand dot
Viewfinder coverage - 100%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.74x
Features
Min shutter speed 12 seconds 30 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 10.0 frames/s 5.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 3.10 m no built-in flash
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye Off, auto, fill flash, slow sync, rear sync, wireless
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Max flash sync - 1/4000 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (120p, 30p)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video data format H.264 MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S, H.264
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 455g (1.00 pounds) 507g (1.12 pounds)
Physical dimensions 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") 113 x 65 x 72mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested 97
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 25.8
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 13.9
DXO Low light rating not tested 3204
Other
Battery life - 220 pictures
Battery form - Battery Pack
Battery ID Li-50B NP-BX1
Self timer Yes (12 or 2 sec) Yes (2,5, 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage media SD/SDHC, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo
Storage slots One One
Pricing at release $270 $3,300