Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony T900
69 Imaging
36 Features
35 Overall
35
96 Imaging
34 Features
30 Overall
32
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony T900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Boost to 1000)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Announced February 2010
- Later Model is Olympus SP-810 UZ
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
- Introduced February 2009
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony T900 Overview
Lets take a more detailed look at the Olympus SP-800 UZ and Sony T900, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Ultracompact by companies Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the SP-800 UZ (14MP) and the T900 (12MP) is fairly similar and both cameras have the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe SP-800 UZ was launched 12 months later than the T900 which means that they are both of a similar age. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus SP-800 UZ being a Compact camera and the Sony T900 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting into a full comparison, here is a simple view of how the SP-800 UZ matches up versus the T900 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony T900 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus SP-800 UZ & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery & Sony T900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-800 UZ over the Sony T900
| SP-800 UZ | T900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2010 |  | February 2009 | More recent by 12 months |
Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Olympus SP-800 UZ
| T900 | SP-800 UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Display size | 3.5" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+692k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus SP-800 UZ and Sony T900
| SP-800 UZ | T900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen |
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to lug around your camera, you need to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus SP-800 UZ has got external measurements of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") and a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs) whilst the Sony T900 has sizing of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") along with a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).
Check the Olympus SP-800 UZ and Sony T900 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are employing during that time. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the SP-800 UZ against the T900.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SP-800 UZ and T900 is 69 and 96 respectively.
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its tough to imagine the difference between sensor measurements just by reviewing a spec sheet. The graphic below will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the SP-800 UZ and T900.
As you can see, the 2 cameras feature the identical sensor size but different megapixels. You can anticipate the Olympus SP-800 UZ to deliver greater detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images way more aggressively. The fresher SP-800 UZ should have an edge in sensor tech.
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony T900 Specifications
| Olympus SP-800 UZ | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus SP-800 UZ | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2010-02-02 | 2009-02-17 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 1000 | - |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 143 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-840mm (30.0x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | f/3.5-10.0 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3.5" |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 922 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 12s | 2s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.10 m | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 455g (1.00 lbs) | 143g (0.32 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") | 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | Li-50B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $270 | $300 |