Olympus SP-810 UZ vs Samsung WB350F
78 Imaging
37 Features
34 Overall
35
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e0063/e00637e5677671b8b72fa1976b25d95bb3a79c37" alt="Olympus SP-810 UZ front Olympus SP-810 UZ front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/70455/70455b470de7a381df26b21e53c60bdd7569f00d" alt="Samsung WB350F front Samsung WB350F front"
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
Olympus SP-810 UZ vs Samsung WB350F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-864mm (F2.9-5.7) lens
- 413g - 106 x 76 x 74mm
- Announced July 2011
- Replaced the Olympus SP-800 UZ
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 276g - 114 x 65 x 25mm
- Introduced January 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus SP-810 UZ vs Samsung WB350F Overview
On this page, we will be reviewing the Olympus SP-810 UZ and Samsung WB350F, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by competitors Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the SP-810 UZ (14MP) and the WB350F (16MP) is pretty similar and both cameras have the same sensor size (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The SP-810 UZ was announced 3 years earlier than the WB350F which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus SP-810 UZ being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung WB350F being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise view of how the SP-810 UZ scores against the WB350F when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus SP-810 UZ vs Samsung WB350F Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus SP-810 UZ & Samsung WB350F. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus SP-810 UZ Gallery & Samsung WB350F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-810 UZ over the Samsung WB350F
SP-810 UZ | WB350F |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB350F over the Olympus SP-810 UZ
WB350F | SP-810 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2014 | ![]() | July 2011 | More modern by 29 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus SP-810 UZ and Samsung WB350F
SP-810 UZ | WB350F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen |
Olympus SP-810 UZ vs Samsung WB350F Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you should consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus SP-810 UZ offers external dimensions of 106mm x 76mm x 74mm (4.2" x 3.0" x 2.9") having a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB350F has proportions of 114mm x 65mm x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") along with a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).
Check the Olympus SP-810 UZ and Samsung WB350F in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are working with at that moment. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the SP-810 UZ against the WB350F.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f42f4/f42f405bc4b73354161a01fdc3fc069036387e1c" alt="Olympus SP-810 UZ vs Samsung WB350F size comparison Olympus SP-810 UZ vs Samsung WB350F size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SP-810 UZ and WB350F is 78 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e3573/e357312c9590630528101def914c1fec1f341d1c" alt="Olympus SP-810 UZ vs Samsung WB350F top view buttons comparison Olympus SP-810 UZ vs Samsung WB350F top view buttons comparison"
Olympus SP-810 UZ vs Samsung WB350F Sensor Comparison
Typically, its tough to picture the difference between sensor sizes only by going over specifications. The image underneath will help give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the SP-810 UZ and WB350F.
Plainly, both of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different resolution. You can expect the Samsung WB350F to deliver greater detail with its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures more aggressively. The more aged SP-810 UZ is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4bafe/4bafe0ad23b181fd8f29b294773c9c119ba90f50" alt="Olympus SP-810 UZ vs Samsung WB350F sensor size comparison Olympus SP-810 UZ vs Samsung WB350F sensor size comparison"
Olympus SP-810 UZ vs Samsung WB350F Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/811eb/811eb9bffe0f192564cf3fc7af4151bb74a7e5cc" alt="Olympus SP-810 UZ vs Samsung WB350F Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus SP-810 UZ vs Samsung WB350F Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus SP-810 UZ vs Samsung WB350F Specifications
Olympus SP-810 UZ | Samsung WB350F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus SP-810 UZ | Samsung WB350F |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2011-07-27 | 2014-01-07 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III+ | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-864mm (36.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.9-5.7 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 5cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 1/4 secs | 16 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1200 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 0.7 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 6.20 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4 | - |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 413g (0.91 lbs) | 276g (0.61 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 106 x 76 x 74mm (4.2" x 3.0" x 2.9") | 114 x 65 x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | Li-50B | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $280 | $260 |