Clicky

Olympus SP-810 UZ vs Samsung WB350F

Portability
78
Imaging
37
Features
34
Overall
35
Olympus SP-810 UZ front
 
Samsung WB350F front
Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
46
Overall
42

Olympus SP-810 UZ vs Samsung WB350F Key Specs

Olympus SP-810 UZ
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-864mm (F2.9-5.7) lens
  • 413g - 106 x 76 x 74mm
  • Announced July 2011
  • Replaced the Olympus SP-800 UZ
Samsung WB350F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 276g - 114 x 65 x 25mm
  • Introduced January 2014
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus SP-810 UZ vs Samsung WB350F Overview

On this page, we will be reviewing the Olympus SP-810 UZ and Samsung WB350F, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by competitors Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the SP-810 UZ (14MP) and the WB350F (16MP) is pretty similar and both cameras have the same sensor size (1/2.3").

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The SP-810 UZ was announced 3 years earlier than the WB350F which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus SP-810 UZ being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung WB350F being a Compact camera.

Before getting straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise view of how the SP-810 UZ scores against the WB350F when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus SP-810 UZ over the Samsung WB350F

 SP-810 UZ WB350F 

Reasons to pick Samsung WB350F over the Olympus SP-810 UZ

 WB350F SP-810 UZ 
IntroducedJanuary 2014July 2011More modern by 29 months
Manually focus More precise focus
Screen resolution460k230kClearer screen (+230k dot)
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Olympus SP-810 UZ and Samsung WB350F

 SP-810 UZ WB350F 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen size
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen

Olympus SP-810 UZ vs Samsung WB350F Physical Comparison

For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you should consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus SP-810 UZ offers external dimensions of 106mm x 76mm x 74mm (4.2" x 3.0" x 2.9") having a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB350F has proportions of 114mm x 65mm x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") along with a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).

Check the Olympus SP-810 UZ and Samsung WB350F in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are working with at that moment. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the SP-810 UZ against the WB350F.

Olympus SP-810 UZ vs Samsung WB350F size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SP-810 UZ and WB350F is 78 and 90 respectively.

Olympus SP-810 UZ vs Samsung WB350F top view buttons comparison

Olympus SP-810 UZ vs Samsung WB350F Sensor Comparison

Typically, its tough to picture the difference between sensor sizes only by going over specifications. The image underneath will help give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the SP-810 UZ and WB350F.

Plainly, both of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different resolution. You can expect the Samsung WB350F to deliver greater detail with its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures more aggressively. The more aged SP-810 UZ is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus SP-810 UZ vs Samsung WB350F sensor size comparison

Olympus SP-810 UZ vs Samsung WB350F Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus SP-810 UZ vs Samsung WB350F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus SP-810 UZ
Portrait photography with Samsung WB350F
33
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
supports face detection autofocus
lack of manual focus
no manual exposure
external flash not possible
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
40
you can focus manually
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
no external flash support
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Olympus SP-810 UZ Street photography advice
Samsung WB350F Street photography advice
50
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen does not articulate
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
61
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (276g)
fixed screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus SP-810 UZ
Sports photography with Samsung WB350F
40
excellent zoom range (24-864mm 36.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
supports tracking autofocus
maximum shutter speed is a little low (1/1,200 seconds)
slow fps (0.7 frames/s)
no shutter priority mode
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
50
incredible zoom range (23-483mm 21.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Olympus SP-810 UZ Travel photography factors
Samsung WB350F Travel photography factors
61
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
really wide (24mm)
great zoom (864mm)
doesn't have Timelapse function
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
69
lighter than competition (276g)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
built-in flash
rather wide (23mm)
great reach (483mm)
no Timelapse mode
screen is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f2.8)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Olympus SP-810 UZ Landscape photography info
Samsung WB350F Landscape photography info
40
really wide (24mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (14MP)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
no manual exposure
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
doesn't have Timelapse function
50
you can focus manually
rather wide (23mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
no Timelapse mode
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus SP-810 UZ Vlogging details
Samsung WB350F Vlogging details
27
really wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detection autofocus
slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 pxls)
doesn't have external microphone jack
34
rather wide (23mm)
touchscreen enabled
image stabilization (Optical)
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competition (276g)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
screen is not selfie friendly
no microphone port
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus SP-810 UZ vs Samsung WB350F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus SP-810 UZ and Samsung WB350F
 Olympus SP-810 UZSamsung WB350F
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Samsung
Model type Olympus SP-810 UZ Samsung WB350F
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2011-07-27 2014-01-07
Body design SLR-like (bridge) Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic III+ -
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 4:3
Full resolution 4288 x 3216 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 3200 3200
Minimum native ISO 80 80
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-864mm (36.0x) 23-483mm (21.0x)
Highest aperture f/2.9-5.7 f/2.8-5.9
Macro focusing range 5cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 230k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 1/4 secs 16 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/1200 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 0.7 frames per sec -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 6.20 m -
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye -
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080
Max video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video file format MPEG-4 -
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 413g (0.91 lbs) 276g (0.61 lbs)
Physical dimensions 106 x 76 x 74mm (4.2" x 3.0" x 2.9") 114 x 65 x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID Li-50B SLB-10A
Self timer Yes (12 or 2 sec) -
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC
Storage slots One One
Launch cost $280 $260