Olympus SZ-10 vs Olympus VG-110
90 Imaging
37 Features
36 Overall
36
97 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
Olympus SZ-10 vs Olympus VG-110 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-504mm (F3.1-4.4) lens
- 215g - 106 x 67 x 38mm
- Launched February 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 105g - 92 x 54 x 20mm
- Revealed February 2011
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus SZ-10 vs Olympus VG-110 Overview
Let's look a bit more closely at the Olympus SZ-10 versus Olympus VG-110, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Ultracompact and both are built by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the SZ-10 (14MP) and the VG-110 (12MP) is pretty well matched and they feature the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe SZ-10 was launched very close to the VG-110 and they are both of a similar age. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus SZ-10 being a Compact camera and the Olympus VG-110 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving through a thorough comparison, below is a quick summation of how the SZ-10 scores vs the VG-110 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus SZ-10 vs Olympus VG-110 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus SZ-10 & Olympus VG-110. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus SZ-10 Gallery & Olympus VG-110 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-10 over the Olympus VG-110
| SZ-10 | VG-110 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-110 over the Olympus SZ-10
| VG-110 | SZ-10 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus SZ-10 and Olympus VG-110
| SZ-10 | VG-110 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2011 |  | February 2011 | Similar age |
| Manual focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lack of Touch screen |
Olympus SZ-10 vs Olympus VG-110 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to lug around your camera, you are going to need to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus SZ-10 enjoys physical dimensions of 106mm x 67mm x 38mm (4.2" x 2.6" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs) while the Olympus VG-110 has measurements of 92mm x 54mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") along with a weight of 105 grams (0.23 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus SZ-10 versus Olympus VG-110 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you choose during that time. The following is the front view physical size comparison of the SZ-10 and the VG-110.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the SZ-10 and VG-110 is 90 and 97 respectively.
Olympus SZ-10 vs Olympus VG-110 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's difficult to see the difference between sensor measurements purely by checking specifications. The graphic below should provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the SZ-10 and VG-110.
Plainly, both of those cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the Olympus SZ-10 to give you greater detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots a little more aggressively.
Olympus SZ-10 vs Olympus VG-110 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus SZ-10 vs Olympus VG-110 Specifications
| Olympus SZ-10 | Olympus VG-110 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus SZ-10 | Olympus VG-110 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2011-02-08 | 2011-02-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III+ | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-504mm (18.0x) | 27-108mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.1-4.4 | f/2.9-6.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Screen resolution | 460k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.10 m | 4.70 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 215 gr (0.47 lb) | 105 gr (0.23 lb) |
| Dimensions | 106 x 67 x 38mm (4.2" x 2.6" x 1.5") | 92 x 54 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 shots | 170 shots |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-50B | LI-70B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $300 | $150 |