Olympus SZ-10 vs Panasonic G9
90 Imaging
37 Features
36 Overall
36


62 Imaging
60 Features
90 Overall
72
Olympus SZ-10 vs Panasonic G9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-504mm (F3.1-4.4) lens
- 215g - 106 x 67 x 38mm
- Revealed February 2011
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 658g - 137 x 97 x 92mm
- Launched November 2017

Olympus SZ-10 vs Panasonic Lumix G9: An In-Depth Comparison for Every Photographer
Choosing the right camera often boils down to matching gear to your personal style, photographic needs, and, of course, budget. Today, I’ll guide you through a detailed comparison between two vastly different cameras: the Olympus SZ-10, a modest compact superzoom from 2011, and the Panasonic Lumix G9, a professional-level mirrorless powerhouse introduced in 2017. Both promise versatile shooting, but their target users could not be more distinct.
Having thoroughly tested thousands of cameras over the years, I’ll focus on practical, real-world performance across a broad spectrum of photography disciplines - portrait to astro, macro to sports - with a hefty dose of technical scrutiny. By the end, you’ll know exactly which camera fits your needs, and why. Let’s dive right in.
Getting a Feel for Size and Handling: One’s Compact, One’s Commanding
Size and ergonomics can make or break daily use. The Olympus SZ-10 comes in a pocketable compact shell designed for casual shooting, whereas the Panasonic G9 is a robust, DSLR-styled mirrorless system tailored for demanding hands-on control.
With dimensions of 106x67x38mm and weighing just 215g, the SZ-10 slips easily into a jacket pocket or purse. It’s lightweight, so ideal for travel photographers or anyone wanting a truly grab-and-go option. However, its small size means shorter grip surfaces and fewer physical buttons - something I noticed during my trial meant less tactile control, especially for quick adjustments.
In contrast, the Panasonic G9 measures a substantial 137x97x92mm, weighing 658g sans lens (which, depending on your MFT glass, can add substantial heft). Its deep grip, generous button layout, and weather sealing promise the handling comfort and durability expected from a pro-grade tool. If you shoot for hours, the G9’s ergonomics will definitely reduce fatigue and streamline operation.
Looking from the top, the G9 features dedicated dials for shutter speed, ISO, and exposure compensation alongside a top LCD screen, placing essential settings at your fingertips. The SZ-10, by contrast, offers a minimalist button array typical of compacts, relying on menus rather than heftier physical controls. For photographers who like manual exposure control, the G9 is hands-down.
Sensor Technology and Image Quality: Seeing the Marked Difference
Sensor size and technology form the backbone of image quality, influencing sharpness, dynamic range, ISO performance, and overall fidelity. Let’s pit the SZ-10’s 1/2.3” CCD against the G9’s Four Thirds CMOS sensor.
The SZ-10 packs a tiny 28.07mm² sensor surface area at 14MP resolution, typical of compact superzoom cameras. While the sensor can capture decent 4288x3216 images, image quality - especially in low light - is inherently limited by noise and dynamic range constraints.
Conversely, the Panasonic G9 boasts a much larger 224.90mm² sensor (about eight times larger surface area) with 20MP resolution and no optical low-pass filter, maximizing detail. The larger sensor area allows better light gathering, cleaner images at high ISO, and smoother tonal gradations - visible advantages for landscapes, portraits, and even astrophotography.
Dynamic range and color depth also favor the G9, thanks to CMOS technology and advanced image processing. Don’t expect dazzling results from the SZ-10 beyond bright daylight; shadows will block up quickly, and highlights may clip. The G9, meanwhile, lets you recover detail from both ends quite adeptly.
Behind the View: Display and Viewfinder Usability
Another key usability factor is the LCD screen and viewfinder system. The SZ-10 uses a fixed 3-inch TFT color LCD with a modest 460k-dot resolution. It’s fine for reviewing shots and composing with live view, but visibility under sunlight and fine detail appreciation is limited.
The Panasonic G9 upgrades this with a fully articulated 3-inch touchscreen LCD at 1040k dots, enabling flexible angles and touch focus - a boon for video or macro shooters. Plus, the G9 sports a high-res electronic viewfinder (EVF) with 3680k dots, 100% coverage, and 0.83x magnification, giving photographers an optical-like framing experience, even in bright environments.
The G9’s articulated screen and EVF provide multiple composition options, essential for professionals who shoot on location or in varied lighting. The SZ-10 lacks any EVF, limiting your framing to the back screen, which may feel unwieldy or imprecise in tricky light.
Autofocus and Shooting Speed: From Single-Shot to Action
Autofocus performance is critical depending on your subject matter. The SZ-10 relies on contrast-detection with face detection and basic tracking, with a single continuous shooting speed of just 1fps. This is fine for family snapshots or landscapes but lacks the aggressive focusing speed and accuracy needed for fast-moving subjects.
The Panasonic G9 counters with a sophisticated system featuring 225 focus points, including selective, tracking, face, and eye detection autofocus. It supports continuous AF and bursts up to 20fps in electronic shutter mode, catering to sports, wildlife, or any action-packed situations demanding swift response.
This difference is palpable in the field. I tested both on fast-moving subjects - the SZ-10 struggled to lock focus quickly and often hunted, while the G9 nailed sharp focus almost instantly, even in low light or chaotic scenes.
Exploring Photography Genres Through Real-World Application
Now, how do these two cameras perform across different photographic styles and needs? I’ll break down their relative merits in several popular genres.
Portrait Photography: Skin Tones and Bokeh
Portraits demand accurate skin tone rendering, eye detection AF for sharp focus, and lens capability to produce smooth background blur.
The SZ-10 offers a maximum aperture range of f/3.1–4.4 and a fixed 18x zoom (28-504mm in 35mm terms). Its small sensor and lens constraints mean achieving creamy bokeh is challenging; backgrounds often remain distracting. Face detection helps slightly, but without eye AF or selective focus areas, precision is limited.
The G9 shines here. Thanks to the Four Thirds sensor and availability of fast prime and portrait lenses, you can generate impressively shallow depth of field and beautifully rendered skin tones. Its eye detection autofocus is reliable and fast, enabling crisp portraits with natural skin tone fidelity and separation from backgrounds.
Landscape Photography: Resolution and Dynamic Range
Here, resolution, dynamic range, and durability (weather sealing) count.
With 14MP and a small sensor, the SZ-10’s image quality under wide daylight is passable, but lacks detail necessary for large prints or cropping. Dynamic range is limited, and shadow/highlight clipping occurs easily.
The G9’s 20MP sensor and no AA filter deliver fine details and robust dynamic range. Additionally, its weather sealing means you can shoot outdoors confidently in varied environments. For landscapes, the G9’s higher resolution, expanded ISO range, and robust body translate into unsurpassed versatility.
Wildlife Photography: Autofocus and Burst Rates
Wildlife demands high-speed AF with reliable tracking and strong telephoto reach.
SZ-10’s lens zoom is mighty on the long end (504mm equivalent), but autofocus speed and burst rate (1fps) are woefully slow, and tracking is rudimentary. You may capture moments, but chances of sharp series are slim.
G9 offers a state-of-the-art autofocus system with 20fps burst shooting and excellent tracking aid, plus compatibility with fast telephoto MFT lenses. While the native sensor crop factor is 2.0x (so, less reach than SZ-10’s 18x zoom), the superior AF and frame rate make it a winning combo for decisive wildlife shots.
Sports Photography: Tracking Precision and Low Light Speed
Sports shooting requires rapid continuous autofocus, high frame rates, and decent sensor sensitivity.
The SZ-10 falls short - single FPS mode and simple contrast focus limit usability for fast-paced sports.
The G9 excels with 20fps burst modes (silent or mechanical shutter), advanced AF tracking, and native ISO up to 25600, extending performance into dim venues or evening games.
Street Photography: Portability Meets Performance
Street shooters prize stealth, portability, and quick response.
The compact SZ-10 is ideal for discreet shooting due to its size - less conspicuous and faster to pull out in candid scenarios.
G9, though considerably bulkier, offers superior image quality, faster AF, and versatility. However, its size can be a detriment for street photographers emphasizing spontaneity and low-profile gear. That said, customization of silent shutter modes reduces noise footprint.
Macro Photography: Close-Range Focus Precision
Close focusing and stabilisation matter here.
The SZ-10 boasts a 1cm macro focus range, great for casual close-ups but constrained by its fixed lens optical quality.
The G9 doesn’t advertise a specific macro range but benefits from focus stacking, bracketing, and the option to pair with a variety of dedicated macro lenses and powerful 5-axis sensor stabilization. This makes it a much more flexible and precise macro tool.
Night and Astro Photography: High ISO and Exposure Control
Higher ISO and long exposure capabilities are crucial for low light and astrophotography.
SZ-10 maxes out at ISO 1600 with limited noise handling and shutter speed range up to 1/2000s. Its slow max shutter speed can help for short exposures, but lacks manual shutter control and RAW shooting, limiting post-processing latitude.
G9 features native ISO 200–25600, excellent high ISO noise performance, full manual exposure modes, bulb, and support for RAW files. Plus, its in-body stabilization assists handheld night shots, a major advantage in astro photography.
Video Capabilities: Just a Snapshot or Full Production?
If video is in your workflow, here’s a quick look:
-
Olympus SZ-10: Records HD 720p video at 30fps in Motion JPEG. No microphone input or advanced video controls, and image stabilization is limited to sensor shift for stills without video-specific modes. Expect basic home videos only.
-
Panasonic G9: Records professional 4K UHD up to 60fps with high bitrate H.264 encoding, a microphone jack, headphone out, and dual SD card slots. Fully articulated touchscreen enhances vlogging or creative angles. The G9’s video capabilities rival dedicated camcorders.
Professional Features and Workflow Compatibility
Pro users require file versatility, ruggedness, and workflow friendliness.
-
Olympus SZ-10 lacks RAW support, limiting exposure and color flexibility during post-processing. Environmental sealing is absent; the camera is vulnerable to moisture and dust.
-
Panasonic G9 supports RAW, has dust and splash resistance, and dual SD card slots with UHS-II for high-speed data transfer. Its USB 3.0 interface and Bluetooth improve tethering and remote control options.
These qualities firmly place the G9 in the professional echelon.
Battery Life and Storage: The Basics Matter
Battery robustness matters on long shoots.
-
SZ-10’s small battery yields ~220 shots per charge; this may necessitate backups for day-long excursions.
-
G9 delivers up to ~400 shots (CIPA rating), with larger battery packs and USB charging options, enhancing its endurance silently.
Both use standard SD/SDHC/SDXC media, but G9’s dual card slots support redundancy or overflow - a professional safeguard.
Sample Images and Real-World Test Shots
Let’s look at actual images captured with both cameras, highlighting their differences in detail, color rendition, and noise handling.
You can see the SZ-10 images exhibit smooth but softer detail, especially in shadows and fine textures. Colors are somewhat muted under challenging light. The G9 delivers punchier colors, sharpened details, and better dynamic range, all while controlling noise well at higher sensitivities.
Summing Up Overall Performance: Scoring the Cameras
Here is a synthesized score breakdown reflecting my comprehensive testing metrics across handling, image quality, autofocus, and versatility.
The Panasonic G9 leads comfortably with high marks for versatility and pro feature set, while the Olympus SZ-10’s strengths center on portability and ease of use.
Specialized Performance Across Photography Types
To further clarify, here is a distilled genre-based performance analysis based on practical testing in each category.
As expected, the G9 tops most categories aside from street photography, where SZ-10’s stealth and simplicity still appeal.
Final Thoughts: Who Should Buy Which?
I know you want clear calls - so here goes.
-
Choose the Olympus SZ-10 if:
- You want an ultra-affordable, compact superzoom camera for casual travel, family snapshots, and occasional landscape panoramas without fuss.
- You prioritize pocketability and ease over image quality and manual control.
- RAW files and advanced features are not on your wish list.
-
Opt for the Panasonic Lumix G9 if:
- You consider photography a serious craft and need a camera that can handle professional portrait, wildlife, sports, macro, night, and video work.
- You want a camera with extensive manual control, rugged build, and wide lens compatibility.
- High image fidelity, fast AF, and video prowess are priorities, and you’re willing to invest accordingly.
A Parting Note from My Experience
In my hands, the Olympus SZ-10 played its part well as a basic travel camera - light, simple, unassuming. The Panasonic G9, however, proved a joy across nearly every genre, embodying the professional flexibility and enduring build I gravitate toward in real-world shooting.
For enthusiasts stepping up, or pros needing a reliable workhorse, the G9’s investment pays for itself tenfold. But if a lightweight companion with an enormous zoom is your goal and pixel-peeping isn't your pastime, the SZ-10 remains a sensible choice.
I hope this comparison helps you make the best decision based on your photographic ambitions, style, and budget. Feel free to ask if you want a hands-on test report on specific lenses or accessory combos for the G9, or a versus with a different compact camera. Happy shooting!
Olympus SZ-10 vs Panasonic G9 Specifications
Olympus SZ-10 | Panasonic Lumix DC-G9 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus SZ-10 | Panasonic Lumix DC-G9 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Pro Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2011-02-08 | 2017-11-08 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III+ | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 20MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5184 x 3888 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 200 |
RAW support | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 225 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens focal range | 28-504mm (18.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/3.1-4.4 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 107 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 1,040 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 3,680 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.83x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/8000s |
Fastest silent shutter speed | - | 1/32000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 1.0fps | 20.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 7.10 m | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 60p / 150 Mbps, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 215g (0.47 pounds) | 658g (1.45 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 106 x 67 x 38mm (4.2" x 2.6" x 1.5") | 137 x 97 x 92mm (5.4" x 3.8" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 photographs | 400 photographs |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-50B | DMW-BLF19 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II supported) |
Storage slots | One | 2 |
Pricing at release | $300 | $1,500 |