Olympus SZ-10 vs Panasonic ZS35
90 Imaging
37 Features
36 Overall
36
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c093a/c093ae2117bb68c7c1561b0f622d9b6a9250e7ec" alt="Olympus SZ-10 front Olympus SZ-10 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/79b96/79b9603f77f7c51f1ac0c53523d43d29d519fd6f" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 front"
89 Imaging
40 Features
50 Overall
44
Olympus SZ-10 vs Panasonic ZS35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-504mm (F3.1-4.4) lens
- 215g - 106 x 67 x 38mm
- Released February 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Boost to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 305g - 107 x 62 x 32mm
- Revealed January 2014
- Also Known as Lumix DMC-TZ55
- Older Model is Panasonic ZS30
- Renewed by Panasonic ZS40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus SZ-10 vs Panasonic ZS35 Overview
Let's take a more detailed look at the Olympus SZ-10 vs Panasonic ZS35, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the SZ-10 (14MP) and the ZS35 (16MP) is fairly similar and both cameras have the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The SZ-10 was released 3 years before the ZS35 and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a thorough comparison, here is a quick overview of how the SZ-10 scores vs the ZS35 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus SZ-10 vs Panasonic ZS35 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus SZ-10 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35. The complete galleries are available at Olympus SZ-10 Gallery & Panasonic ZS35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-10 over the Panasonic ZS35
SZ-10 | ZS35 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS35 over the Olympus SZ-10
ZS35 | SZ-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2014 | ![]() | February 2011 | Fresher by 35 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Olympus SZ-10 and Panasonic ZS35
SZ-10 | ZS35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Lack of manual focusing | ||
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display measurement |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 460k | Same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Absent Touch display |
Olympus SZ-10 vs Panasonic ZS35 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry your camera often, you need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus SZ-10 enjoys external dimensions of 106mm x 67mm x 38mm (4.2" x 2.6" x 1.5") having a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs) whilst the Panasonic ZS35 has dimensions of 107mm x 62mm x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") having a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs).
Check the Olympus SZ-10 vs Panasonic ZS35 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are employing at that moment. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the SZ-10 against the ZS35.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fda94/fda94f3fdc24e8ff02497932cea98d7cf65f3200" alt="Olympus SZ-10 vs Panasonic ZS35 size comparison Olympus SZ-10 vs Panasonic ZS35 size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the SZ-10 and ZS35 is 90 and 89 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/29da1/29da15f706ba73f729020df729c1ae340bb23af2" alt="Olympus SZ-10 vs Panasonic ZS35 top view buttons comparison Olympus SZ-10 vs Panasonic ZS35 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus SZ-10 vs Panasonic ZS35 Sensor Comparison
Often, its tough to imagine the contrast between sensor sizing purely by reading technical specs. The graphic below will help give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the SZ-10 and ZS35.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different MP. You can anticipate the Panasonic ZS35 to deliver greater detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop images more aggressively. The older SZ-10 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ef86b/ef86bdd7c955a85a957355f56593c50af892fbe2" alt="Olympus SZ-10 vs Panasonic ZS35 sensor size comparison Olympus SZ-10 vs Panasonic ZS35 sensor size comparison"
Olympus SZ-10 vs Panasonic ZS35 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c153f/c153f8f308ce2f89cd462269abf33d62b657f711" alt="Olympus SZ-10 vs Panasonic ZS35 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus SZ-10 vs Panasonic ZS35 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus SZ-10 vs Panasonic ZS35 Specifications
Olympus SZ-10 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus SZ-10 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 |
Also Known as | - | Lumix DMC-TZ55 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2011-02-08 | 2014-01-06 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III+ | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 21 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-504mm (18.0x) | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.1-4.4 | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | TFT LCD (180 degree tilt) with AR coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 7.10 m | 6.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 215 grams (0.47 pounds) | 305 grams (0.67 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 106 x 67 x 38mm (4.2" x 2.6" x 1.5") | 107 x 62 x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 photographs | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | LI-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $300 | $300 |