Olympus SZ-10 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS
90 Imaging
36 Features
36 Overall
36
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Olympus SZ-10 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-504mm (F3.1-4.4) lens
- 215g - 106 x 67 x 38mm
- Introduced February 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 236g - 125 x 65 x 32mm
- Announced February 2015
- Superseded the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
- Successor is Ricoh WG-6
Photography Glossary Olympus SZ-10 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Overview
Here is a detailed overview of the Olympus SZ-10 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof by brands Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the SZ-10 (14MP) and the WG-5 GPS (16MP) is relatively similar and both cameras provide the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe SZ-10 was manufactured 5 years earlier than the WG-5 GPS and that is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a in depth comparison, here is a brief summation of how the SZ-10 matches up vs the WG-5 GPS in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus SZ-10 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus SZ-10 & Ricoh WG-5 GPS. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus SZ-10 Gallery & Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-10 over the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
| SZ-10 | WG-5 GPS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-5 GPS over the Olympus SZ-10
| WG-5 GPS | SZ-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2015 | February 2011 | Fresher by 48 months | |
| Manual focus | More precise focusing |
Common features in the Olympus SZ-10 and Ricoh WG-5 GPS
| SZ-10 | WG-5 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen measurement | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 460k | Identical screen resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither provides Touch friendly screen |
Olympus SZ-10 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry your camera, you'll need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus SZ-10 provides outer measurements of 106mm x 67mm x 38mm (4.2" x 2.6" x 1.5") with a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-5 GPS has dimensions of 125mm x 65mm x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") along with a weight of 236 grams (0.52 lbs).
Compare the Olympus SZ-10 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have attached at that time. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the SZ-10 vs the WG-5 GPS.

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the SZ-10 and WG-5 GPS is 90 and 90 respectively.
Olympus SZ-10 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very hard to visualize the difference between sensor sizing purely by reviewing a spec sheet. The visual underneath may give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the SZ-10 and WG-5 GPS.
Clearly, each of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Ricoh WG-5 GPS to deliver extra detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The older SZ-10 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Olympus SZ-10 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Olympus SZ-10 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Specifications
| Olympus SZ-10 | Ricoh WG-5 GPS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus SZ-10 | Ricoh WG-5 GPS |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2011-02-08 | 2015-02-10 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III+ | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-504mm (18.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.1-4.4 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames per second | 14.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.10 m | 10.40 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 215 gr (0.47 lb) | 236 gr (0.52 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 106 x 67 x 38mm (4.2" x 2.6" x 1.5") | 125 x 65 x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 shots | 240 shots |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-50B | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $300 | $500 |