Olympus SZ-10 vs Ricoh WG-50
90 Imaging
37 Features
36 Overall
36
91 Imaging
41 Features
39 Overall
40
Olympus SZ-10 vs Ricoh WG-50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-504mm (F3.1-4.4) lens
- 215g - 106 x 67 x 38mm
- Revealed February 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Released May 2017
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus SZ-10 vs Ricoh WG-50 Overview
Its time to look much closer at the Olympus SZ-10 and Ricoh WG-50, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Waterproof by brands Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the SZ-10 (14MP) and the WG-50 (16MP) is fairly comparable and they use the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe SZ-10 was unveiled 7 years prior to the WG-50 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a detailed comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the SZ-10 scores vs the WG-50 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus SZ-10 vs Ricoh WG-50 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus SZ-10 and Ricoh WG-50. The full galleries are available at Olympus SZ-10 Gallery and Ricoh WG-50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-10 over the Ricoh WG-50
| SZ-10 | WG-50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Olympus SZ-10
| WG-50 | SZ-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | May 2017 |  | February 2011 | More modern by 76 months |
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focus |
Common features in the Olympus SZ-10 and Ricoh WG-50
| SZ-10 | WG-50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lacking Touch display |
Olympus SZ-10 vs Ricoh WG-50 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry around your camera, you'll need to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus SZ-10 offers exterior measurements of 106mm x 67mm x 38mm (4.2" x 2.6" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-50 has measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
See the Olympus SZ-10 and Ricoh WG-50 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are using at that moment. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the SZ-10 vs the WG-50.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SZ-10 and WG-50 is 90 and 91 respectively.
Olympus SZ-10 vs Ricoh WG-50 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very hard to visualize the gap in sensor sizes just by going through technical specs. The pic underneath should offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the SZ-10 and WG-50.
As you have seen, both of those cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different megapixels. You should anticipate the Ricoh WG-50 to produce extra detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics far more aggressively. The more aged SZ-10 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Olympus SZ-10 vs Ricoh WG-50 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus SZ-10 vs Ricoh WG-50 Specifications
| Olympus SZ-10 | Ricoh WG-50 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus SZ-10 | Ricoh WG-50 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2011-02-08 | 2017-05-24 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III+ | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-504mm (18.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.1-4.4 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Display resolution | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0fps | 8.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.10 m | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | On, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Yes (Wireless) |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 215 grams (0.47 pounds) | 193 grams (0.43 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 106 x 67 x 38mm (4.2" x 2.6" x 1.5") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 shots | 300 shots |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-50B | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $300 | $280 |