Clicky

Olympus SZ-10 vs Ricoh WG-M1

Portability
90
Imaging
37
Features
36
Overall
36
Olympus SZ-10 front
 
Ricoh WG-M1 front
Portability
91
Imaging
38
Features
22
Overall
31

Olympus SZ-10 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs

Olympus SZ-10
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-504mm (F3.1-4.4) lens
  • 215g - 106 x 67 x 38mm
  • Revealed February 2011
Ricoh WG-M1
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 1.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 800
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
  • 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
  • Released September 2014
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus SZ-10 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview

The following is a extensive comparison of the Olympus SZ-10 vs Ricoh WG-M1, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the SZ-10 (14MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is very well matched and both cameras offer the identical sensor size (1/2.3").

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The SZ-10 was announced 4 years earlier than the WG-M1 which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before we go straight to a thorough comparison, here is a concise summary of how the SZ-10 grades vs the WG-M1 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-10 over the Ricoh WG-M1

 SZ-10 WG-M1 
Display size3"1.5"Larger display (+1.5")
Display resolution460k115kClearer display (+345k dot)

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Olympus SZ-10

 WG-M1 SZ-10 
ReleasedSeptember 2014February 2011Newer by 43 months

Common features in the Olympus SZ-10 and Ricoh WG-M1

 SZ-10 WG-M1 
Manual focus Lack of manual focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen
Touch display Neither provides Touch display

Olympus SZ-10 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison

For those who are going to travel with your camera, you'll have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus SZ-10 provides outer dimensions of 106mm x 67mm x 38mm (4.2" x 2.6" x 1.5") having a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-M1 has dimensions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).

Check out the Olympus SZ-10 vs Ricoh WG-M1 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you use at that time. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the SZ-10 and the WG-M1.

Olympus SZ-10 vs Ricoh WG-M1 size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the SZ-10 and WG-M1 is 90 and 91 respectively.

Olympus SZ-10 vs Ricoh WG-M1 top view buttons comparison

Olympus SZ-10 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it is hard to visualize the contrast between sensor dimensions just by reading through technical specs. The pic underneath might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the SZ-10 and WG-M1.

As you have seen, both of the cameras come with the identical sensor size and the exact same resolution therefore you can expect similar quality of pictures but you may want to take the age of the products into consideration. The more aged SZ-10 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus SZ-10 vs Ricoh WG-M1 sensor size comparison

Olympus SZ-10 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus SZ-10 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus SZ-10 Portrait photography info
Ricoh WG-M1 Portrait photography info
33
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
provides face detection focus
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not possible
external flash not possible
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
29
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
no manual focus
no manual mode
external flash not possible
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Olympus SZ-10 Street photography advice
Ricoh WG-M1 Street photography advice
60
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition (215g)
no articulating screen
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
52
weather proofing
no articulating screen
no image stabilization
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
low maximum ISO (800)
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus SZ-10
Sports photography with Ricoh WG-M1
40
amazing zoom range (28-504mm 18.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
provides tracking autofocus
max frames per second low (1.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
terrible battery pack (220 CIPA)
has no phase detect auto focus
37
MP count decent (14MP)
weather proofing
good battery pack (350 shots)
fixed focal length ((1×)mm)
no shutter priority
no image stabilization
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Olympus SZ-10 Travel photography advice
Ricoh WG-M1 Travel photography advice
65
lighter than competition (215g)
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (28mm)
very long zoom (504mm)
lack of Timelapse recording
terrible battery pack (220 CIPA)
does not have selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
64
good battery pack (350 per charge)
weather proofing
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
screen is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f2.8)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Olympus SZ-10 Landscape photography factors
Ricoh WG-M1 Landscape photography factors
40
reasonably wide (28mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
lack of manual focus
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
manual exposure not possible
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
terrible battery pack (220 CIPA)
lack of Timelapse recording
35
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
weather proofing
good battery pack (350 shots)
no manual focus
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length ((1×)mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
tiny screen (1.5 inch)
no manual mode
no image stabilization
small sensor size (1/2.3")
low maximum ISO (800)
doesn't have RAW support
doesn't have Timelapse mode
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus SZ-10
Vlogging with Ricoh WG-M1
31
reasonably wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detection focus
lighter than competition (215g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
does not have selfie friendly screen
low res video (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of external microphone port
26
high video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
screen is not selfie friendly
no image stabilization
doesn't have external microphone jack
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus SZ-10 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus SZ-10 and Ricoh WG-M1
 Olympus SZ-10Ricoh WG-M1
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Ricoh
Model type Olympus SZ-10 Ricoh WG-M1
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Waterproof
Revealed 2011-02-08 2014-09-12
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic III+ -
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14MP 14MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Max resolution 4288 x 3216 4320 x 3240
Max native ISO 1600 800
Min native ISO 80 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-504mm (18.0x) (1×)
Maximal aperture f/3.1-4.4 f/2.8
Macro focusing range 1cm -
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inch 1.5 inch
Resolution of screen 460k dot 115k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen tech TFT Color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Min shutter speed 4 secs -
Max shutter speed 1/2000 secs -
Continuous shutter speed 1.0fps 10.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 7.10 m no built-in flash
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in no built-in flash
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p)
Max video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video format Motion JPEG H.264
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 215g (0.47 lb) 190g (0.42 lb)
Physical dimensions 106 x 67 x 38mm (4.2" x 2.6" x 1.5") 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 220 images 350 images
Form of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID LI-50B DB-65
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) -
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC microSD/microSDHC, internal
Storage slots One One
Cost at release $300 $2,000