Olympus SZ-10 vs Sony T900
90 Imaging
37 Features
36 Overall
36
96 Imaging
34 Features
30 Overall
32
Olympus SZ-10 vs Sony T900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-504mm (F3.1-4.4) lens
- 215g - 106 x 67 x 38mm
- Revealed February 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
- Announced February 2009
Olympus SZ-10 vs Sony T900 Overview
Here is a extended assessment of the Olympus SZ-10 vs Sony T900, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the SZ-10 (14MP) and the T900 (12MP) is fairly close and they possess the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe SZ-10 was announced 2 years later than the T900 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus SZ-10 being a Compact camera and the Sony T900 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief summation of how the SZ-10 matches up against the T900 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus SZ-10 vs Sony T900 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus SZ-10 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus SZ-10 Gallery & Sony T900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-10 over the Sony T900
SZ-10 | T900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2011 | February 2009 | Fresher by 25 months |
Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Olympus SZ-10
T900 | SZ-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More accurate focus | |||
Display sizing | 3.5" | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 922k | 460k | Sharper display (+462k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus SZ-10 and Sony T900
SZ-10 | T900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus SZ-10 vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry your camera, you are going to need to consider its weight and size. The Olympus SZ-10 provides outer dimensions of 106mm x 67mm x 38mm (4.2" x 2.6" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs) whilst the Sony T900 has specifications of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") having a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus SZ-10 vs Sony T900 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilising during that time. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the SZ-10 versus the T900.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the SZ-10 and T900 is 90 and 96 respectively.
Olympus SZ-10 vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's difficult to visualise the gap in sensor sizing simply by researching technical specs. The photograph underneath might offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the SZ-10 and T900.
As you have seen, each of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but not the same megapixels. You can anticipate the Olympus SZ-10 to provide you with greater detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop images a little more aggressively. The more recent SZ-10 will have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus SZ-10 vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus SZ-10 vs Sony T900 Specifications
Olympus SZ-10 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus SZ-10 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2011-02-08 | 2009-02-17 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III+ | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-504mm (18.0x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.1-4.4 | f/3.5-10.0 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3.5 inches |
Resolution of display | 460 thousand dot | 922 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 2s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.10 m | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 215 gr (0.47 lb) | 143 gr (0.32 lb) |
Dimensions | 106 x 67 x 38mm (4.2" x 2.6" x 1.5") | 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 photographs | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | LI-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $300 | $300 |