Olympus SZ-11 vs Olympus TG-860
89 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bb371/bb3715e653b80d81ca1f91b80f208bb4b165bff6" alt="Olympus SZ-11 front Olympus SZ-11 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/042ab/042ab9bda5359b24c15525e105c8dbb85792e213" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 front Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 front"
91 Imaging
40 Features
42 Overall
40
Olympus SZ-11 vs Olympus TG-860 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-500mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 226g - 106 x 69 x 40mm
- Announced July 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 224g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Launched February 2015
- Updated by Olympus TG-870
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus SZ-11 vs Olympus TG-860 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Olympus SZ-11 versus Olympus TG-860, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof and they are both built by Olympus. The image resolution of the SZ-11 (14MP) and the TG-860 (16MP) is relatively well matched and both cameras offer the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The SZ-11 was revealed 4 years prior to the TG-860 and that is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus SZ-11 being a Compact camera and the Olympus TG-860 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the SZ-11 grades against the TG-860 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus SZ-11 vs Olympus TG-860 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus SZ-11 and Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus SZ-11 Gallery and Olympus TG-860 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-11 over the Olympus TG-860
SZ-11 | TG-860 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-860 over the Olympus SZ-11
TG-860 | SZ-11 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2015 | ![]() | July 2011 | More recent by 43 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Common features in the Olympus SZ-11 and Olympus TG-860
SZ-11 | TG-860 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | No manual focusing | ||
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen measurements |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 460k | Equal screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither contains Touch screen |
Olympus SZ-11 vs Olympus TG-860 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you'll have to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus SZ-11 has got outside measurements of 106mm x 69mm x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") along with a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs) and the Olympus TG-860 has specifications of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs).
Examine the Olympus SZ-11 versus Olympus TG-860 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you select at that moment. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the SZ-11 and the TG-860.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d028b/d028b6981ad1945fda35eda585907f66fd7740d0" alt="Olympus SZ-11 vs Olympus TG-860 size comparison Olympus SZ-11 vs Olympus TG-860 size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SZ-11 and TG-860 is 89 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5714d/5714d195d40b4fdf83214528fe3eda7d4b7192d2" alt="Olympus SZ-11 vs Olympus TG-860 top view buttons comparison Olympus SZ-11 vs Olympus TG-860 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus SZ-11 vs Olympus TG-860 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very tough to see the gap between sensor measurements only by reading through technical specs. The photograph underneath might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the SZ-11 and TG-860.
As you can tell, both of these cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same MP. You should count on the Olympus TG-860 to give you more detail because of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop pictures way more aggressively. The older SZ-11 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b5f84/b5f84844dbfb8708dde5e05b9b968ecccd614f36" alt="Olympus SZ-11 vs Olympus TG-860 sensor size comparison Olympus SZ-11 vs Olympus TG-860 sensor size comparison"
Olympus SZ-11 vs Olympus TG-860 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ce26f/ce26facfdff9dc4c337835cfba913b46950aaf91" alt="Olympus SZ-11 vs Olympus TG-860 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus SZ-11 vs Olympus TG-860 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus SZ-11 vs Olympus TG-860 Specifications
Olympus SZ-11 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus SZ-11 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Announced | 2011-07-27 | 2015-02-06 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III+ | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/3.5-5.7 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 7.0 frames/s | 7.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 9.30 m (@ ISO 1600) | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Yes |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 226 gr (0.50 lbs) | 224 gr (0.49 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 106 x 69 x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 200 photos | 300 photos |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-50B | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $253 | $279 |