Olympus SZ-11 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS
Portability
89 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
89 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
Portability
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
Olympus SZ-11 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Key Specs
Olympus SZ-11
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-500mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 226g - 106 x 69 x 40mm
- Launched July 2011
Olympus TG-820 iHS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Revealed February 2012
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus SZ-11 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Overview
Below, we will be matching up the Olympus SZ-11 versus Olympus TG-820 iHS, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof and both of them are designed by Olympus. The image resolution of the SZ-11 (14MP) and the TG-820 iHS (12MP) is relatively similar and they possess the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe SZ-11 was introduced 6 months prior to the TG-820 iHS and they are of a similar age. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going through a full comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the SZ-11 grades vs the TG-820 iHS with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus SZ-11 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus SZ-11 & Olympus TG-820 iHS. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus SZ-11 Gallery & Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-11 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
| SZ-11 | TG-820 iHS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Olympus SZ-11
| TG-820 iHS | SZ-11 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 1030k |  | 460k | Sharper screen (+570k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SZ-11 and Olympus TG-820 iHS
| SZ-11 | TG-820 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | July 2011 |  | February 2012 | Similar age |
| Focus manually |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Absent Touch screen |
Olympus SZ-11 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to travel with your camera regularly, you will want to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus SZ-11 offers outer dimensions of 106mm x 69mm x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") having a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs) and the Olympus TG-820 iHS has dimensions of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") and a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Check the Olympus SZ-11 versus Olympus TG-820 iHS in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you use at the time. Following is the front view scale comparison of the SZ-11 compared to the TG-820 iHS.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the SZ-11 and TG-820 iHS is 89 and 92 respectively.
Olympus SZ-11 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very difficult to imagine the gap between sensor dimensions just by going over specifications. The picture underneath should give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the SZ-11 and TG-820 iHS.
Plainly, both cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different MP. You can count on the Olympus SZ-11 to offer greater detail using its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will help you crop shots somewhat more aggressively.
Olympus SZ-11 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Olympus SZ-11
Portrait photography with Olympus TG-820 iHS
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
features face detection focus
no manual focus
no manual control
external flash not possible
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
supports face detection autofocus
focusing manually not possible
no manual exposure
external flash not possible
MP count low (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Olympus SZ-11 as a Street photography camera
Olympus TG-820 iHS as a Street photography camera
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors (226g)
no moving screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment sealing
screen is fixed
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Olympus SZ-11 Sports photography highlights
Olympus TG-820 iHS Sports photography highlights
long zoom range (25-500mm 20.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
features tracking autofocus
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
terrible battery power (200 CIPA)
lack of phase detect auto focus
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports tracking autofocus
environment sealing
slow fps (5.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority mode
MP count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
terrible battery (220 per charge)
has no phase detect autofocus
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Olympus SZ-11 Travel photography information
Olympus TG-820 iHS Travel photography information
lighter than competitors (226g)
good megapixels (14MP)
has built in flash
fairly wide (25mm)
long reach (500mm)
missing Time Lapse function
terrible battery power (200 per charge)
display is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.0)
environment sealing
built-in flash
pretty wide (28mm)
no Timelapse mode
terrible battery (220 shots)
MP count low (12 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Olympus SZ-11 Landscape photography info
Olympus TG-820 iHS Landscape photography info
fairly wide (25mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
no manual control
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
terrible battery power (200 CIPA)
missing Time Lapse function
pretty wide (28mm)
nice screen size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment sealing
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
no manual exposure
MP count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
terrible battery (220 per charge)
no Timelapse mode
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Olympus SZ-11 as a Vlogging camera
Olympus TG-820 iHS as a Vlogging camera
fairly wide (25mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detection focus
lighter than competitors (226 grams)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
display is not selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing external mic support
pretty wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detection autofocus
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
screen is not selfie friendly
no external microphone socket
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus SZ-11 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Specifications
| Olympus SZ-11 | Olympus TG-820 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus SZ-11 | Olympus TG-820 iHS |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2011-07-27 | 2012-02-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III+ | TruePic VI |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 460k dots | 1,030k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 7.0 frames per second | 5.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 9.30 m (@ ISO 1600) | 3.50 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 226 grams (0.50 pounds) | 206 grams (0.45 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 106 x 69 x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 200 images | 220 images |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-50B | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $253 | $500 |