Olympus SZ-11 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
89 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
Olympus SZ-11 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-500mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 226g - 106 x 69 x 40mm
- Launched July 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Revealed December 2012
Olympus SZ-11 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
Here is a complete analysis of the Olympus SZ-11 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both are built by Olympus. The image resolution of the SZ-11 (14MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) is very well matched but the SZ-11 (1/2.3") and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") posses different sensor measurements.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe SZ-11 was released 17 months prior to the XZ-2 iHS making them a generation apart from each other. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the SZ-11 grades vs the XZ-2 iHS when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus SZ-11 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus SZ-11 & Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus SZ-11 Gallery & Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-11 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
SZ-11 | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Olympus SZ-11
XZ-2 iHS | SZ-11 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | December 2012 | July 2011 | Fresher by 17 months | |
Manually focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 920k | 460k | Sharper display (+460k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus SZ-11 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
SZ-11 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display measurements | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen |
Olympus SZ-11 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry your camera often, you will want to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus SZ-11 has got exterior measurements of 106mm x 69mm x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") and a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs) while the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has proportions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") along with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Look at the Olympus SZ-11 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you select at the time. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the SZ-11 against the XZ-2 iHS.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the SZ-11 and XZ-2 iHS is 89 and 85 respectively.
Olympus SZ-11 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be tough to picture the gap between sensor sizing simply by checking a spec sheet. The photograph underneath might offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the SZ-11 and XZ-2 iHS.
Clearly, both of those cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The SZ-11 due to its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field harder and the Olympus SZ-11 will give you more detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics way more aggressively. The older SZ-11 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus SZ-11 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus SZ-11 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
Olympus SZ-11 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus SZ-11 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2011-07-27 | 2012-12-18 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III+ | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 35 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 7.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 9.30 m (@ ISO 1600) | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 226 gr (0.50 lb) | 346 gr (0.76 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 106 x 69 x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 49 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 216 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 200 images | 340 images |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-50B | Li-90B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $253 | $450 |