Olympus SZ-11 vs Panasonic FS42
89 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bb371/bb3715e653b80d81ca1f91b80f208bb4b165bff6" alt="Olympus SZ-11 front Olympus SZ-11 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f9979/f9979d6158b07faa33963a04f4938253f5f9ce99" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 front"
95 Imaging
33 Features
10 Overall
23
Olympus SZ-11 vs Panasonic FS42 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-500mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 226g - 106 x 69 x 40mm
- Launched July 2011
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1000 (Bump to 6400)
- 640 x 480 video
- 33-132mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 132g - 98 x 55 x 22mm
- Revealed April 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus SZ-11 vs Panasonic FS42 Overview
Here, we are analyzing the Olympus SZ-11 and Panasonic FS42, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Ultracompact by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a considerable gap among the sensor resolutions of the SZ-11 (14MP) and FS42 (10MP) and the SZ-11 (1/2.3") and FS42 (1/2.5") posses totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The SZ-11 was unveiled 2 years after the FS42 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus SZ-11 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FS42 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving into a thorough comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the SZ-11 grades vs the FS42 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus SZ-11 vs Panasonic FS42 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus SZ-11 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus SZ-11 Gallery & Panasonic FS42 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-11 over the Panasonic FS42
SZ-11 | FS42 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | July 2011 | ![]() | April 2009 | More modern by 28 months |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FS42 over the Olympus SZ-11
FS42 | SZ-11 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus SZ-11 and Panasonic FS42
SZ-11 | FS42 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | No manual focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Absent Touch friendly display |
Olympus SZ-11 vs Panasonic FS42 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry around your camera often, you will want to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus SZ-11 has outside dimensions of 106mm x 69mm x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") having a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FS42 has dimensions of 98mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs).
Examine the Olympus SZ-11 and Panasonic FS42 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have chosen during that time. Here is a front view dimensions comparison of the SZ-11 and the FS42.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/93a3a/93a3a039c1a151f983aa705ef0700db1fc98778a" alt="Olympus SZ-11 vs Panasonic FS42 size comparison Olympus SZ-11 vs Panasonic FS42 size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SZ-11 and FS42 is 89 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4cc52/4cc52d7bcc94aa6bbb79d0d52aa0c9ab5a092b20" alt="Olympus SZ-11 vs Panasonic FS42 top view buttons comparison Olympus SZ-11 vs Panasonic FS42 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus SZ-11 vs Panasonic FS42 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very tough to visualise the gap in sensor sizes simply by researching specs. The picture underneath may give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the SZ-11 and FS42.
All in all, both of these cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The SZ-11 having a larger sensor will make getting bokeh easier and the Olympus SZ-11 will result in greater detail having an extra 4MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more modern SZ-11 is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c7ccd/c7ccddb35b2b108e303a0e09781b6e72dff98b3c" alt="Olympus SZ-11 vs Panasonic FS42 sensor size comparison Olympus SZ-11 vs Panasonic FS42 sensor size comparison"
Olympus SZ-11 vs Panasonic FS42 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a9543/a9543c141bf33ba536e26693fc53680b63ea1e0a" alt="Olympus SZ-11 vs Panasonic FS42 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus SZ-11 vs Panasonic FS42 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus SZ-11 vs Panasonic FS42 Specifications
Olympus SZ-11 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus SZ-11 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2011-07-27 | 2009-04-17 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III+ | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.5" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 24.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1000 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 33-132mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 6.3 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
Screen resolution | 460k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 7.0 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 9.30 m (@ ISO 1600) | 6.30 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 226 grams (0.50 lbs) | 132 grams (0.29 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 106 x 69 x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") | 98 x 55 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 200 shots | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | LI-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $253 | $580 |