Clicky

Olympus SZ-11 vs Ricoh CX4

Portability
89
Imaging
37
Features
37
Overall
37
Olympus SZ-11 front
 
Ricoh CX4 front
Portability
92
Imaging
33
Features
34
Overall
33

Olympus SZ-11 vs Ricoh CX4 Key Specs

Olympus SZ-11
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 25-500mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
  • 226g - 106 x 69 x 40mm
  • Launched July 2011
Ricoh CX4
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
  • 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
  • Announced August 2010
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus SZ-11 vs Ricoh CX4 Overview

Lets look more in depth at the Olympus SZ-11 vs Ricoh CX4, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a large gap among the resolutions of the SZ-11 (14MP) and CX4 (10MP) but both cameras have the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The SZ-11 was revealed 12 months after the CX4 which means that they are of a similar age. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before going right into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise summary of how the SZ-11 grades against the CX4 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-11 over the Ricoh CX4

 SZ-11 CX4 
AnnouncedJuly 2011August 2010More modern by 12 months

Reasons to pick Ricoh CX4 over the Olympus SZ-11

 CX4 SZ-11 
Manual focus More precise focus
Screen resolution920k460kCrisper screen (+460k dot)

Common features in the Olympus SZ-11 and Ricoh CX4

 SZ-11 CX4 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen measurement
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch screen Neither contains Touch screen

Olympus SZ-11 vs Ricoh CX4 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera, you will have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus SZ-11 has got exterior measurements of 106mm x 69mm x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") having a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX4 has proportions of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).

Look at the Olympus SZ-11 vs Ricoh CX4 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the SZ-11 compared to the CX4.

Olympus SZ-11 vs Ricoh CX4 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SZ-11 and CX4 is 89 and 92 respectively.

Olympus SZ-11 vs Ricoh CX4 top view buttons comparison

Olympus SZ-11 vs Ricoh CX4 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it is very difficult to picture the difference in sensor sizes merely by going through technical specs. The pic here will provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the SZ-11 and CX4.

As you can tell, both of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different MP. You can count on the Olympus SZ-11 to show more detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures more aggressively. The fresher SZ-11 provides a benefit with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus SZ-11 vs Ricoh CX4 sensor size comparison

Olympus SZ-11 vs Ricoh CX4 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus SZ-11 vs Ricoh CX4 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus SZ-11 Portrait photography info
Ricoh CX4 Portrait photography info
33
decent MP (14 megapixels)
supports face detection focus
focusing manually not possible
lack of manual mode
cannot use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
26
focusing manually
lack of manual mode
can't use external flash
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Olympus SZ-11 Street photography details
Ricoh CX4 Street photography details
60
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than others (226 grams)
no articulating screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
60
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average (205g)
screen is fixed
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Olympus SZ-11 Sports photography factors
Ricoh CX4 Sports photography factors
43
great zoom range (25-500mm 20.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (14 megapixels)
supports tracking autofocus
no shutter priority mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
low battery life (200 shots)
lack of phase detect auto focus
24
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
max fps very slow (5.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Olympus SZ-11 Travel photography features
Ricoh CX4 Travel photography features
65
lighter than others (226 grams)
decent MP (14MP)
built-in flash
really wide (25mm)
very long zoom (500mm)
does not have Time Lapse mode
low battery life (200 CIPA)
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
66
lighter than average (205 grams)
flash built-in
rather wide (28mm)
very long zoom (300mm)
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Olympus SZ-11 Landscape photography features
Ricoh CX4 Landscape photography features
40
really wide (25mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
lack of manual mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
low battery life (200 CIPA)
does not have Time Lapse mode
42
focusing manually
rather wide (28mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
lack of manual mode
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus SZ-11 as a Vlogging camera
Ricoh CX4 as a Vlogging camera
31
really wide (25mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detection focus
lighter than others (226g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 resolution)
does not have external mic support
30
rather wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average (205g)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
low res video (1280 x 720 resolution)
does not have external mic jack
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus SZ-11 vs Ricoh CX4 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus SZ-11 and Ricoh CX4
 Olympus SZ-11Ricoh CX4
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus SZ-11 Ricoh CX4
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2011-07-27 2010-08-19
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic III+ Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14MP 10MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Highest resolution 4288 x 3216 3648 x 2736
Highest native ISO 1600 3200
Min native ISO 80 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 25-500mm (20.0x) 28-300mm (10.7x)
Maximum aperture f/3.0-6.9 f/3.5-5.6
Macro focus range 1cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 460 thousand dot 920 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Screen technology TFT Color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4 secs 8 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 7.0 frames per second 5.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 9.30 m (@ ISO 1600) 4.00 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 226 gr (0.50 lb) 205 gr (0.45 lb)
Physical dimensions 106 x 69 x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 200 images -
Battery format Battery Pack -
Battery model LI-50B DB-100
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2, 10 or Custom)
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Launch price $253 $211