Olympus SZ-11 vs Samsung NX210
89 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bb371/bb3715e653b80d81ca1f91b80f208bb4b165bff6" alt="Olympus SZ-11 front Olympus SZ-11 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/88a11/88a11bb02e0ad8b3bdbbf0916f24e031f73d8b87" alt="Samsung NX210 front Samsung NX210 front"
90 Imaging
62 Features
57 Overall
60
Olympus SZ-11 vs Samsung NX210 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-500mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 226g - 106 x 69 x 40mm
- Released July 2011
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 222g - 117 x 63 x 37mm
- Introduced August 2012
- Succeeded the Samsung NX200
- Updated by Samsung NX300
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus SZ-11 vs Samsung NX210 Overview
Here, we will be contrasting the Olympus SZ-11 versus Samsung NX210, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Samsung. There exists a substantial gap between the resolutions of the SZ-11 (14MP) and NX210 (20MP) and the SZ-11 (1/2.3") and NX210 (APS-C) posses different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The SZ-11 was unveiled 12 months before the NX210 and they are both of a similar age. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus SZ-11 being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX210 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving into a in depth comparison, here is a brief view of how the SZ-11 grades against the NX210 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus SZ-11 vs Samsung NX210 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus SZ-11 & Samsung NX210. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus SZ-11 Gallery & Samsung NX210 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-11 over the Samsung NX210
SZ-11 | NX210 |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung NX210 over the Olympus SZ-11
NX210 | SZ-11 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2012 | ![]() | July 2011 | More recent by 12 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Screen resolution | 614k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper screen (+154k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SZ-11 and Samsung NX210
SZ-11 | NX210 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Lacking Touch screen |
Olympus SZ-11 vs Samsung NX210 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to lug around your camera often, you'll have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus SZ-11 provides exterior dimensions of 106mm x 69mm x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") with a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs) and the Samsung NX210 has dimensions of 117mm x 63mm x 37mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.5") with a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs).
Check out the Olympus SZ-11 versus Samsung NX210 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the SZ-11 and the NX210.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52e71/52e71ecbdb15279cf1b41a4e2c1b46f9319149d2" alt="Olympus SZ-11 vs Samsung NX210 size comparison Olympus SZ-11 vs Samsung NX210 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SZ-11 and NX210 is 89 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6d13/a6d136758a23dc8c0ab0c0d6240de07ab0a51c89" alt="Olympus SZ-11 vs Samsung NX210 top view buttons comparison Olympus SZ-11 vs Samsung NX210 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus SZ-11 vs Samsung NX210 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is hard to imagine the gap between sensor measurements only by checking specifications. The visual below might give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the SZ-11 and NX210.
To sum up, both cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The SZ-11 using its tinier sensor is going to make shooting bokeh trickier and the Samsung NX210 will give extra detail having an extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures way more aggressively. The older SZ-11 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e03d7/e03d7db53cd1fc00f4d64c6afc31f9ae69459a7f" alt="Olympus SZ-11 vs Samsung NX210 sensor size comparison Olympus SZ-11 vs Samsung NX210 sensor size comparison"
Olympus SZ-11 vs Samsung NX210 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/efe60/efe60ae9a2a402d85ec3484e56e8a123ed9f17ba" alt="Olympus SZ-11 vs Samsung NX210 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus SZ-11 vs Samsung NX210 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus SZ-11 vs Samsung NX210 Specifications
Olympus SZ-11 | Samsung NX210 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Samsung |
Model | Olympus SZ-11 | Samsung NX210 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2011-07-27 | 2012-08-14 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III+ | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 15 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens focal range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 32 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 460k dot | 614k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | Active Matrix OLED screen |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 7.0 frames per sec | 8.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 9.30 m (@ ISO 1600) | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1920 x 810 (24 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 226g (0.50 pounds) | 222g (0.49 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 106 x 69 x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") | 117 x 63 x 37mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 71 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.8 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.5 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 719 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 200 photos | 330 photos |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-50B | BC1030 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $253 | $625 |